Literature DB >> 9775449

Judgments of chemical risks: comparisons among senior managers, toxicologists, and the public.

C K Mertz1, P Slovic, I F Purchase.   

Abstract

Nineteen Senior Managers of a major chemical company in the United Kingdom participated in a survey to determine their attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions regarding risks from chemicals. Similar surveys had previously been conducted with toxicologists and members of the general public in the United States and Canada. In general, the Senior Managers tended to judge risks to be quite small for most chemicals. Moreover, they had lower risk perceptions than did members of the British Toxicological Society and even far lower perceptions of risk than a comparison group of members of the Canadian public. The managers held views that were similar to British toxicologists working in industry and government and dissimilar to the views of toxicologists working in academia. The observed differences between views of managers, toxicologists, and the public must be recognized and understood in order to facilitate communication and constructive efforts to manage chemical risks.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9775449     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00353.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  7 in total

1.  Factors influencing acquisition of ecological and exposure information about hazards and risks from contaminated sites.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Greenberg; Michael Gochfeld; Sheila Shukla; Karen Lowrie; Roger Keren
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Avian influenza risk perception, Hong Kong.

Authors:  Richard Fielding; Wendy W T Lam; Ella Y Y Ho; Tai Hing Lam; Anthony J Hedley; Gabriel M Leung
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.883

3.  Heterogeneous risk perceptions: the case of poultry meat purchase intentions in Finland.

Authors:  Jaakko Heikkilä; Eija Pouta; Sari Forsman-Hugg; Johanna Mäkelä
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Perception of Environmental Risks and Health Promotion Attitudes of French Perinatal Health Professionals.

Authors:  Cécile Marie; Didier Lémery; Françoise Vendittelli; Marie-Pierre Sauvant-Rochat
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  A Study on the Strategy of Sustainable Governance of NIMBY Movements: Focusing on Civil Environmental Rights.

Authors:  Chen Cao
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2022-08-25

6.  Expert views on regulatory preparedness for managing the risks of nanotechnologies.

Authors:  Christian E H Beaudrie; Terre Satterfield; Milind Kandlikar; Barbara H Harthorn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Scientists versus regulators: precaution, novelty & regulatory oversight as predictors of perceived risks of engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  Christian E H Beaudrie; Terre Satterfield; Milind Kandlikar; Barbara H Harthorn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.