Literature DB >> 9773756

Course of distress experienced by persons at risk for an autosomal dominant inheritable disorder participating in a predictive testing program: an explorative study. Rotterdam/Leiden Genetics Workgroup.

A C Dudok deWit1, H J Duivenvoorden, J Passchier, M F Niermeijer, A Tibben.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of predictive DNA testing on participants at risk for either Huntington disease (HD), or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), or hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC).
METHOD: Psychological distress was measured with the Impact of Event Scale before testing and at 1 week and 6 months after the test result, in individuals at 50% risk for either HD (N = 25), FAP (N = 23), or HBOC (N = 10).
RESULTS: A marginally significant trend was found indicating that carriers of the disease genes tended to show unchanged levels of distress during the study period whereas noncarriers showed the expected decrease. Men reported significantly less distress than women, and 1 week after the test result male noncarriers showed a sharp significant increase in the reported distress followed by a steady decline up to 6 months later.
CONCLUSIONS: The course of distress over time reported by carriers and noncarriers of the three disease genes was similar, which leads one to conclude that the previous experience with predictive testing for Huntington Disease may be a useful paradigm. However, those formerly at risk for HD reported more distress than those at risk for FAP and HBOC. From our clinical experience we learned that individuals at risk for FAP and HBOC are more inclined to ward off the emotions involved. Additional qualitative studies should be undertaken to investigate this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9773756     DOI: 10.1097/00006842-199809000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychosom Med        ISSN: 0033-3174            Impact factor:   4.312


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of a counselling protocol for predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  K Aktan-Collan; J P Mecklin; A de la Chapelle; P Peltomäki; A Uutela; H Kääriäinen
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 2.  Methodology in longitudinal studies on psychological effects of predictive DNA testing: a review.

Authors:  R Timman; T Stijnen; A Tibben
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Breast cancer-specific intrusions are associated with increased cortisol responses to daily life stressors in healthy women without personal or family histories of breast cancer.

Authors:  Lucia Dettenborn; Gary D James; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Guy H Montgomery; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-08-30

Review 4.  The psychological impact of predictive genetic testing for Huntington's disease: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  S Crozier; N Robertson; M Dale
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Who Is at Risk for Psychological Distress in Genetic Testing Programs for Hereditary Cancer Disorders?

Authors:  F J Grosfeld; C J Lips; F A Beemer; H F Ten Kroode
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Emotional distress following genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Marci Lobel; Anne Moyer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Comparing test-specific distress of susceptibility versus deterministic genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Michael R Cassidy; J Scott Roberts; Thomas D Bird; Ellen J Steinbart; L Adrienne Cupples; Clara A Chen; Erin Linnenbringer; Robert C Green
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 21.566

8.  Attitude towards prophylactic surgery and effects of genetic counselling in families with BRCA mutations. Austrian Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Group.

Authors:  T M Wagner; R Möslinger; G Langbauer; R Ahner; E Fleischmann; A Auterith; A Friedmann; T Helbich; C Zielinski; E Pittermann; M Seifert; P Oefner
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Mapping psychosocial interventions in familial colorectal cancer: a rapid systematic review.

Authors:  Andrada Ciucă; Ramona Moldovan; Adriana Băban
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.