S S Cross1, K M Feeley, C A Angel. 1. Department of Pathology, University of Sheffield Medical School, UK. s.s.cross@sheffield.ac.uk
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the effect of different interventions on the inclusion of data items in the histopathology reports of resected colorectal carcinomas. STUDY POPULATION: 272 routine histopathology reports on colorectal carcinomas from the department of histopathology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield. METHODS: The presence or absence of 10 specific data items was recorded for each report. The reports were divided into five audit periods. In the initial period reports were generated using free text with no agreed guidelines. In period 2, text guidelines had been issued; in period 3, flow diagram guidelines had been issued; and in periods 4 and 5, template proformas were attached to each specimen request form. RESULTS: All interventions produced some increase in inclusion rate for some features, but only with the introduction of template proformas did these rates approach 100% for all data items. Inclusion rates were 100% for all items in all cases reported using a proforma. In the final audit period 96% of specimens were reported using proformas. CONCLUSIONS: Template proformas produce a high rate of inclusion of data items in reports of colorectal carcinoma resection specimens.
AIM: To investigate the effect of different interventions on the inclusion of data items in the histopathology reports of resected colorectal carcinomas. STUDY POPULATION: 272 routine histopathology reports on colorectal carcinomas from the department of histopathology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield. METHODS: The presence or absence of 10 specific data items was recorded for each report. The reports were divided into five audit periods. In the initial period reports were generated using free text with no agreed guidelines. In period 2, text guidelines had been issued; in period 3, flow diagram guidelines had been issued; and in periods 4 and 5, template proformas were attached to each specimen request form. RESULTS: All interventions produced some increase in inclusion rate for some features, but only with the introduction of template proformas did these rates approach 100% for all data items. Inclusion rates were 100% for all items in all cases reported using a proforma. In the final audit period 96% of specimens were reported using proformas. CONCLUSIONS: Template proformas produce a high rate of inclusion of data items in reports of colorectal carcinoma resection specimens.
Authors: L Bottaci; P J Drew; J E Hartley; M B Hadfield; R Farouk; P W Lee; I M Macintyre; G S Duthie; J R Monson Journal: Lancet Date: 1997-08-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: H B Burke; P H Goodman; D B Rosen; D E Henson; J N Weinstein; F E Harrell; J R Marks; D P Winchester; D G Bostwick Journal: Cancer Date: 1997-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Andrew Churg; Richard Attanoos; Alain C Borczuk; Lucian R Chirieac; Françoise Galateau-Sallé; Allen Gibbs; Douglas Henderson; Victor Roggli; Valerie Rusch; Meagan J Judge; John R Srigley Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: Cathy Bennett; Paul Moayyedi; Douglas A Corley; John DeCaestecker; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Gary Falk; Nimish Vakil; Scott Sanders; Michael Vieth; John Inadomi; David Aldulaimi; Khek-Yu Ho; Robert Odze; Stephen J Meltzer; Eamonn Quigley; Stuart Gittens; Peter Watson; Giovanni Zaninotto; Prasad G Iyer; Leo Alexandre; Yeng Ang; James Callaghan; Rebecca Harrison; Rajvinder Singh; Pradeep Bhandari; Raf Bisschops; Bita Geramizadeh; Philip Kaye; Sheila Krishnadath; M Brian Fennerty; Hendrik Manner; Katie S Nason; Oliver Pech; Vani Konda; Krish Ragunath; Imdadur Rahman; Yvonne Romero; Richard Sampliner; Peter D Siersema; Jan Tack; Tony C K Tham; Nigel Trudgill; David S Weinberg; Jean Wang; Kenneth Wang; Jennie Y Y Wong; Stephen Attwood; Peter Malfertheiner; David MacDonald; Hugh Barr; Mark K Ferguson; Janusz Jankowski Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 10.864