Literature DB >> 9762873

Using binary logistic regression models for ordinal data with non-proportional odds.

R Bender1, U Grouven.   

Abstract

The proportional odds model (POM) is the most popular logistic regression model for analyzing ordinal response variables. However, violation of the main model assumption can lead to invalid results. This is demonstrated by application of this method to data of a study investigating the effect of smoking on diabetic retinopathy. Since the proportional odds assumption is not fulfilled, separate binary logistic regression models are used for dichotomized response variables based upon cumulative probabilities. This approach is compared with polytomous logistic regression and the partial proportional odds model. The separate binary logistic regression approach is slightly less efficient than a joint model for the ordinal response. However, model building, investigating goodness-of-fit, and interpretation of the results is much easier for binary responses. The careful application of separate binary logistic regressions represents a simple and adequate tool to analyze ordinal data with non-proportional odds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9762873     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00066-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  32 in total

1.  Frailty and mortality among Chinese at advanced ages.

Authors:  Danan Gu; Matthew E Dupre; Jessica Sautter; Haiyan Zhu; Yuzhi Liu; Zeng Yi
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  A unified framework for the comparison of treatments with ordinal responses.

Authors:  Tong-Yu Lu; Wai-Yin Poon; Siu Hung Cheung
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 3.  Clinical trial design in the neurocritical care unit.

Authors:  C E Hall; M Mirski; Y Y Palesch; M N Diringer; A I Qureshi; C S Robertson; R Geocadin; C A C Wijman; P D Le Roux; Jose I Suarez
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Subepidermal moisture detection of pressure induced tissue damage on the trunk: The pressure ulcer detection study outcomes.

Authors:  Barbara M Bates-Jensen; Heather E McCreath; Anabel Patlan
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.617

5.  Are Periventricular Lesions Specific for Multiple Sclerosis?

Authors:  Gianna Casini; Mary Yurashevich; Rohini Vanga; Subasini Dash; Suhayl Dhib-Jalbut; Brian Gerhardstein; Matilde Inglese; Win Toe; Konstantin E Balashov
Journal:  J Neurol Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-03

6.  Regression analysis of ordinal stroke clinical trial outcomes: an application to the NINDS t-PA trial.

Authors:  Stacia M Desantis; Christos Lazaridis; Yuko Palesch; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 5.266

7.  The Effect of Undiagnosed Diabetes on the Association Between Self-Reported Diabetes and Cognitive Impairment Among Older Mexican Adults.

Authors:  Brian Downer; Amit Kumar; Hemalkumar Mehta; Soham Al Snih; Rebeca Wong
Journal:  Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.035

8.  The trend odds model for ordinal data.

Authors:  Ana W Capuano; Jeffrey D Dawson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Prevalence, demographics, and psychological associations of sleep disruption in patients with cancer: University of Rochester Cancer Center-Community Clinical Oncology Program.

Authors:  Oxana G Palesh; Joseph A Roscoe; Karen M Mustian; Thomas Roth; Josée Savard; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Charles Heckler; Jason Q Purnell; Michelle C Janelsins; Gary R Morrow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Self-report of alcohol use for pain in a multi-ethnic community sample.

Authors:  Joseph L Riley; Christopher King
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.820

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.