Literature DB >> 24288031

A unified framework for the comparison of treatments with ordinal responses.

Tong-Yu Lu1, Wai-Yin Poon, Siu Hung Cheung.   

Abstract

Different latent variable models have been used to analyze ordinal categorical data which can be conceptualized as manifestations of an unobserved continuous variable. In this paper, we propose a unified framework based on a general latent variable model for the comparison of treatments with ordinal responses. The latent variable model is built upon the location-scale family and is rich enough to include many important existing models for analyzing ordinal categorical variables, including the proportional odds model, the ordered probit-type model, and the proportional hazards model. A flexible estimation procedure is proposed for the identification and estimation of the general latent variable model, which allows for the location and scale parameters to be freely estimated. The framework advances the existing methods by enabling many other popular models for analyzing continuous variables to be used to analyze ordinal categorical data, thus allowing for important statistical inferences such as location and/or dispersion comparisons among treatments to be conveniently drawn. Analysis on real data sets is used to illustrate the proposed methods.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24288031     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-013-9367-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  13 in total

1.  A latent normal distribution model for analysing ordinal responses with applications in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wai-Yin Poon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Modeling and inference for an ordinal effect size measure.

Authors:  Euijung Ryu; Alan Agresti
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Use of ordinal outcomes in vascular prevention trials: comparison with binary outcomes in published trials.

Authors:  Philip M W Bath; Chamila Geeganage; Laura J Gray; Timothy Collier; Stuart Pocock
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Using binary logistic regression models for ordinal data with non-proportional odds.

Authors:  R Bender; U Grouven
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Proportional odds model for dose-finding clinical trial designs with ordinal toxicity grading.

Authors:  Emily M Van Meter; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Sample size calculations for ordered categorical data.

Authors:  J Whitehead
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Improving power to detect disease progression in multiple sclerosis through alternative analysis strategies.

Authors:  Brian Healy; Tanuja Chitnis; David Engler
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Assessing toxicities in a clinical trial: Bayesian inference for ordinal data nested within categories.

Authors:  L G Leon-Novelo; X Zhou; B Nebiyou Bekele; P Müller
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Using historical lesion volume data in the design of a new phase II clinical trial in acute stroke.

Authors:  John Whitehead; Kim Bolland; Elsa Valdès-Márquez; Anela Lihic; Myzoon Ali; Kennedy Lees
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Subdissociative-dose ketamine versus fentanyl for analgesia during propofol procedural sedation: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  David W Messenger; Heather E Murray; Paul E Dungey; Janet van Vlymen; Marco L A Sivilotti
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 3.451

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.