Literature DB >> 9762533

Deaf culture, cochlear implants, and elective disability.

B P Tucker.   

Abstract

The use of cochlear implants, especially for prelingually deafened children, has aroused heated debate. Members and proponents of Deaf culture vigorously oppose implants both as a seriously invasive treatment of dubious efficacy and as a threat to Deaf culture. Some find these arguments persuasive; others do not. And in this context arise questions about the extent to which individuals with disabilities may decline treatments to ameliorate disabling conditions. When they do so, to what extent may they call upon society to provide supportive services and accommodations?

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americans with Disabilities Act 1990; National Association of the Deaf; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9762533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep        ISSN: 0093-0334            Impact factor:   2.683


  21 in total

Review 1.  Education and debate: Deaf lesbians, "designer disability," and the future of medicine.

Authors:  Julian Savulescu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-10-05

2.  Treatment of Deaf Clients: Ethical Considerations for Professionals in Psychology.

Authors:  Cassandra L Boness
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2015-08-25

3.  Deafness, genetics and dysgenics.

Authors:  Rui Nunes
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006

4.  Ethical dimension of paediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  R Nunes
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001-08

5.  Hear Me Out: Hearing Each Other for the First Time: The Implications of Cochlear Implant Activation.

Authors:  Amelia Cooper
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec

6.  Enhancement technology and outcomes: what professionals and researchers can learn from those skeptical about cochlear implants.

Authors:  Patrick Kermit
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2012-12

7.  Cochlear Implantation, Enhancements, Transhumanism and Posthumanism: Some Human Questions.

Authors:  Joseph Lee
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  The right not to hear: the ethics of parental refusal of hearing rehabilitation.

Authors:  Serena Byrd; Andrew G Shuman; Sharon Kileny; Paul R Kileny
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Saving Deaf Children? Screening for Hearing loss as a Public-interest Case.

Authors:  Sigrid Bosteels; Michel Vandenbroeck; Geert Van Hove
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 1.352

10.  Are attempts to have impaired children justifiable?

Authors:  K W Anstey
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.