Literature DB >> 12356952

Are attempts to have impaired children justifiable?

K W Anstey1.   

Abstract

In a recent case, artificial insemination was employed by a couple in an attempt to ensure the birth of a deaf child. In response to this, I argue that individuals should not be allowed to select for or against deafness. While I establish that preferences for deaf children can be inherently just, allowing individuals to secure these preferences may have unacceptable consequences for existing persons who are deaf. I show that these follow even granting this couple's contestable understanding of the deaf as a minority group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12356952      PMCID: PMC1733653          DOI: 10.1136/jme.28.5.286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  6 in total

1.  Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps.

Authors:  J E Bickenbach; S Chatterji; E M Badley; T B Ustün
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Genetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open future.

Authors:  D S Davis
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

3.  Sex selection and disability avoidance: is their opposed treatment conceptually consistent?

Authors:  Kyle W Anstey
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2002-01

4.  Deaf culture, cochlear implants, and elective disability.

Authors:  B P Tucker
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.683

5.  Do deaf people see better? Texture segmentation and visual search compensate in adult but not in juvenile subjects.

Authors:  R Rettenbach; G Diller; R Sireteanu
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children.

Authors:  J Savulescu
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.898

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  A rational cure for prereproductive stress syndrome.

Authors:  M Häyry
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Conceptualising health: insights from the capability approach.

Authors:  Iain Law; Heather Widdows
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-10-06

Review 3.  Studying potential donors' views on embryonic stem cell therapies and preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Erica Haimes; Jacquelyne Luce
Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.767

4.  There is a difference between selecting a deaf embryo and deafening a hearing child.

Authors:  M Häyry
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Persons and their parts: new reproductive technologies and risks of commodification.

Authors:  Heather Widdows
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2009-01-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.