Literature DB >> 9761043

A multicenter trial on the efficacy of using tirilazad mesylate in cases of head injury.

L F Marshall1, A I Maas, S B Marshall, A Bricolo, M Fearnside, F Iannotti, M R Klauber, J Lagarrigue, R Lobato, L Persson, J D Pickard, J Piek, F Servadei, G N Wellis, G F Morris, E D Means, B Musch.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors prospectively studied the efficacy of tirilazad mesylate, a novel aminosteroid, in humans with head injuries.
METHODS: A cohort of 1120 head-injured patients received at least one dose of study medication (tirilazad or placebo). Eighty-five percent (957) of the patients had suffered a severe head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 4-8) and 15% (163) had sustained a moderate head injury (GCS score 9-12). Six-month outcomes for the tirilazad- and placebo-treated groups for the Glasgow Outcome Scale categories of both good recovery and death showed no significant difference (good recovery in the tirilazad-treated group was 39% compared with the placebo group in which it was 42% [p=0.461]; death in the tirilazad-treated group occurred in 26% of patients compared with the placebo group, in which it occurred in 25% [p=0.750]). Subgroup analysis suggested that tirilazad mesylate may be effective in reducing mortality rates in males suffering from severe head injury with accompanying traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (death in the tirilazad-treated group occurred in 34% of patients; in the placebo group it occurred in 43% [p=0.026]). No significant differences in frequency or types of serious adverse events were shown between the treatment and placebo groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Striking problems with imbalance concerning basic prognostic variables were observed in spite of the large population studied. These imbalances concerned pretreatment hypotension, pretreatment hypoxia, and the incidence of epidural hematomas. In future trials of pharmacological therapy for severe head injury, serious consideration must be given to alternative randomization strategies. Given the heterogeneous nature of head injury and the identification of populations that do relatively well with standard therapy, target populations with a higher risk for mortality and morbidity may be more suitable for clinical trials of such agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9761043     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.4.0519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  55 in total

1.  Mass volume measurement in severe head injury: accuracy and feasibility of two pragmatic methods.

Authors:  N Stocchetti; M Croci; D Spagnoli; F Gilardoni; F Resta; A Colombo
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 2.  Mechanisms of organ dysfunction in critical illness: report from a Round Table Conference held in Brussels.

Authors:  M P Fink; T W Evans
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Clinical trials in head injury.

Authors:  Raj K Narayan; Mary Ellen Michel; Beth Ansell; Alex Baethmann; Anat Biegon; Michael B Bracken; M Ross Bullock; Sung C Choi; Guy L Clifton; Charles F Contant; William M Coplin; W Dalton Dietrich; Jamshid Ghajar; Sean M Grady; Robert G Grossman; Edward D Hall; William Heetderks; David A Hovda; Jack Jallo; Russell L Katz; Nachshon Knoller; Patrick M Kochanek; Andrew I Maas; Jeannine Majde; Donald W Marion; Anthony Marmarou; Lawrence F Marshall; Tracy K McIntosh; Emmy Miller; Noel Mohberg; J Paul Muizelaar; Lawrence H Pitts; Peter Quinn; Gad Riesenfeld; Claudia S Robertson; Kenneth I Strauss; Graham Teasdale; Nancy Temkin; Ronald Tuma; Charles Wade; Michael D Walker; Michael Weinrich; John Whyte; Jack Wilberger; A Byron Young; Lorraine Yurkewicz
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 4.  A review of neuroprotection pharmacology and therapies in patients with acute traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Kevin W McConeghy; Jimmi Hatton; Lindsey Hughes; Aaron M Cook
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  External validity of risk models: Use of benchmark values to disentangle a case-mix effect from incorrect coefficients.

Authors:  Yvonne Vergouwe; Karel G M Moons; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  Research in Emergency and Critical Care Settings: Debates, Obstacles and Solutions.

Authors:  Ayman El-Menyar; Mohammad Asim; Rifat Latifi; Hassan Al-Thani
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 7.  Therapies targeting lipid peroxidation in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Tamil Selvan Anthonymuthu; Elizabeth Megan Kenny; Hülya Bayır
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 8.  Hypertonic saline: a clinical review.

Authors:  R Tyagi; K Donaldson; C M Loftus; J Jallo
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2007-06-16       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Addressing the challenges of obtaining functional outcomes in traumatic brain injury research: missing data patterns, timing of follow-up, and three prognostic models.

Authors:  Leila R Zelnick; Laurie J Morrison; Sean M Devlin; Eileen M Bulger; Karen J Brasel; Kellie Sheehan; Joseph P Minei; Jeffrey D Kerby; Samuel A Tisherman; Sandro Rizoli; Riyad Karmy-Jones; Rardi van Heest; Craig D Newgard
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Phenelzine Protects Brain Mitochondrial Function In Vitro and In Vivo following Traumatic Brain Injury by Scavenging the Reactive Carbonyls 4-Hydroxynonenal and Acrolein Leading to Cortical Histological Neuroprotection.

Authors:  John E Cebak; Indrapal N Singh; Rachel L Hill; Juan A Wang; Edward D Hall
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.