Literature DB >> 24552494

Addressing the challenges of obtaining functional outcomes in traumatic brain injury research: missing data patterns, timing of follow-up, and three prognostic models.

Leila R Zelnick1, Laurie J Morrison, Sean M Devlin, Eileen M Bulger, Karen J Brasel, Kellie Sheehan, Joseph P Minei, Jeffrey D Kerby, Samuel A Tisherman, Sandro Rizoli, Riyad Karmy-Jones, Rardi van Heest, Craig D Newgard.   

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common and debilitating. Randomized trials of interventions for TBI ideally assess effectiveness by using long-term functional neurological outcomes, but such outcomes are difficult to obtain and costly. If there is little change between functional status at hospital discharge versus 6 months, then shorter-term outcomes may be adequate for use in future clinical trials. Using data from a previously published multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled TBI clinical trial, we evaluated patterns of missing outcome data, changes in functional status between hospital discharge and 6 months, and three prognostic models to predict long-term functional outcome from covariates available at hospital discharge (functional measures, demographics, and injury characteristics). The Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Hypertonic Saline trial enrolled 1282 TBI patients, obtaining the primary outcome of 6-month Glasgow Outcome Score Extended (GOSE) for 85% of patients, but missing the primary outcome for the remaining 15%. Patients with missing outcomes had less-severe injuries, higher neurological function at discharge (GOSE), and shorter hospital stays than patients whose GOSE was obtained. Of 1066 (83%) patients whose GOSE was obtained both at hospital discharge and at 6-months, 71% of patients had the same dichotomized functional status (severe disability/death vs. moderate/no disability) after 6 months as at discharge, 28% had an improved functional status, and 1% had worsened. Performance was excellent (C-statistic between 0.88 and 0.91) for all three prognostic models and calibration adequate for two models (p values, 0.22 and 0.85). Our results suggest that multiple imputation of the standard 6-month GOSE may be reasonable in TBI research when the primary outcome cannot be obtained through other means.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trial design; functional outcomes; prognostic models; traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24552494      PMCID: PMC4043258          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2013.3122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  26 in total

1.  The relation between acute physiological variables and outcome on the Glasgow Outcome Scale and Disability Rating Scale following severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  M A Struchen; H J Hannay; C F Contant; C S Robertson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 2.  A critical look at methods for handling missing covariates in epidemiologic regression analyses.

Authors:  S Greenland; W D Finkle
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale.

Authors:  G M Teasdale; L E Pettigrew; J T Wilson; G Murray; B Jennett
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use.

Authors:  J T Wilson; L E Pettigrew; G M Teasdale
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Predicting outcomes after traumatic brain injury: the development and validation of prognostic models based on admission characteristics.

Authors:  Fang Yuan; Jun Ding; Hao Chen; Yan Guo; Gan Wang; Wen-Wei Gao; Shi-Wen Chen; Heng-Li Tian
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.313

6.  A comparison of anlaytic methods for non-random missingness of outcome data.

Authors:  S L Crawford; S L Tennstedt; J B McKinlay
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Effects of pegorgotein on neurologic outcome of patients with severe head injury. A multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  B Young; J W Runge; K S Waxman; T Harrington; J Wilberger; J P Muizelaar; A Boddy; J W Kupiec
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-08-21       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials.

Authors:  Roderick J Little; Ralph D'Agostino; Michael L Cohen; Kay Dickersin; Scott S Emerson; John T Farrar; Constantine Frangakis; Joseph W Hogan; Geert Molenberghs; Susan A Murphy; James D Neaton; Andrea Rotnitzky; Daniel Scharfstein; Weichung J Shih; Jay P Siegel; Hal Stern
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  A multicenter trial of the efficacy of nimodipine on outcome after severe head injury. The European Study Group on Nimodipine in Severe Head Injury.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Outcome measures for clinical trials involving traumatically brain-injured patients: report of a conference.

Authors:  G L Clifton; R L Hayes; H S Levin; M E Michel; S C Choi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  8 in total

1.  Glasgow Outcome Scale Measures and Impact on Analysis and Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Jose-Miguel Yamal; H Julia Hannay; Shankar Gopinath; Imoigele P Aisiku; Julia S Benoit; Claudia S Robertson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Long-Term Outcomes after Pediatric Injury: Results of the Assessment of Functional Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life after Pediatric Trauma Study.

Authors:  Randall S Burd; Aaron R Jensen; John M VanBuren; Jessica S Alvey; Rachel Richards; Richard Holubkov; Murray M Pollack
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Predicting Global Functional Outcomes Among Post-traumatic Epilepsy Patients After Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Development of a Prognostic Model.

Authors:  Tingting Yu; Xiao Liu; Lei Sun; Ruijuan Lv; Jianping Wu; Qun Wang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 4.  Cellular Therapies in Trauma and Critical Care Medicine: Forging New Frontiers.

Authors:  Shibani Pati; Marcello Pilia; Juanita M Grimsley; Alexia T Karanikas; Blessing Oyeniyi; John B Holcomb; Andrew P Cap; Todd E Rasmussen
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Ocular Straylight: A Determinant of Quality of Life in the Elderly?

Authors:  Sigrid Mueller-Schotte; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Marieke J Schuurmans
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Med       Date:  2015-10-09

6.  Handling of Missing Outcome Data in Traumatic Brain Injury Research: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sophie Richter; Susan Stevenson; Tom Newman; Lindsay Wilson; David K Menon; Andrew I R Maas; Daan Nieboer; Hester Lingsma; Ewout W Steyerberg; Virginia F J Newcombe
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Effects of intraoperative lung-protective ventilation on clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lulu Jiang; Yujuan Wu; Yang Zhang; Dahao Lu; Keshi Yan; Ju Gao
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Modeling community integration in workers with delayed recovery from mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Tatyana Mollayeva; Colin M Shapiro; Shirin Mollayeva; J David Cassidy; Angela Colantonio
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.474

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.