Literature DB >> 9758600

Prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis carriers: an economic evaluation.

P T Rowley1, S Loader, R M Kaplan.   

Abstract

The cloning of the CFTR gene has made it technically possible to avert the unwanted birth of a child with cystic fibrosis (CF). Several large trials offering prenatal CF carrier screening suggest that such screening is practical and that identified carriers generally use the information obtained. Therefore, a critical question is whether the cost of such screening is justified. Decision analysis was performed that used information about choices that pregnant women were observed to make at each stage in the Rochester prenatal carrier-screening trial. The cost of screening per CF birth voluntarily averted was estimated to be $1,320,000-$1,400,000. However, the lifetime medical cost of the care of a CF child in today's dollars was estimated to be slightly>$1,000,000. Therefore, despite both the high cost of carrier testing and the relative infrequency of CF conceptions in the general population, the averted medical-care cost resulting from choices freely made are estimated to offset approximately 74%-78% of the costs of a screening program. At present, if it is assumed that a pregnancy terminated because of CF is replaced, the marginal cost for prenatal CF carrier screening is estimated to be $8,290 per quality-adjusted life-year. This value compares favorably with that of many accepted medical services. The cost of prenatal CF carrier screening could fall to equal the averted costs of CF patient care if the cost of carrier testing were to fall to $100.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9758600      PMCID: PMC1377475          DOI: 10.1086/302042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  42 in total

1.  Stepwise or couple antenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis?: women's preferences and willingness to pay.

Authors:  Z Miedzybrodzka; J Semper; P Shackley; M Abdalla; C Donaldson
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Cost-benefit analysis of a national screening programme for cystic fibrosis in an Israeli population.

Authors:  G Ginsberg; H Blau; E Kerem; C Springer; B S Kerem; E Akstein; A Greenberg; A Kolumbos; D Abeliovich; E Gazit
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: 5 years' experience reviewed.

Authors:  D J Brock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-01-20       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Cost effectiveness of antenatal screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  H S Cuckle; G A Richardson; T A Sheldon; P Quirke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-12-02

5.  Cost containment and reproductive autonomy: prenatal genetic screening and the American Health Security Act of 1993.

Authors:  D T Morris
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  1994

6.  Prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  M E Mennie; A Gilfillan; M Compton; L Curtis; W A Liston; I Pullen; D A Whyte; D J Brock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-07-25       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The cost-effectiveness of prenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  T A Lieu; S E Watson; A E Washington
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Screening for carriers of cystic fibrosis among pregnant women: a pilot study.

Authors:  M Schwartz; N J Brandt; F Skovby
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Cystic fibrosis carrier screening: knowledge and attitudes of prenatal care providers.

Authors:  P T Rowley; S Loader; J C Levenkron; C E Phelps
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  The introduction of cystic fibrosis carrier screening into clinical practice: policy considerations.

Authors:  B S Wilfond; N Fost
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.911

View more
  8 in total

1.  Measuring the value of public health systems: the disconnect between health economists and public health practitioners.

Authors:  Peter J Neumann; Peter D Jacobson; Jennifer A Palmer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Attitudes of potential providers towards preconceptional cystic fibrosis carrier screening.

Authors:  Francis A M Poppelaars; Herman J Adèr; Martina C Cornel; Lidewij Henneman; Rosella P M G Hermens; Gerrit van der Wal; Leo P ten Kate
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Measuring health preferences for use in cost-utility and cost-benefit analyses of interventions in children: theoretical and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Lisa A Prosser; James K Hammitt; Ron Keren
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Impact of gene patents and licensing practices on access to genetic testing for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Christopher Heaney; Tamara James; Chris Conover; Robert Cook-Deegan
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 5.  Evaluating Cost-effectiveness of Interventions That Affect Fertility and Childbearing: How Health Effects Are Measured Matters.

Authors:  Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Margaret L Brandeau
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.749

6.  Carrier screening by next-generation sequencing: health benefits and cost effectiveness.

Authors:  Mohammad Azimi; Kyle Schmaus; Valerie Greger; Dana Neitzel; Robert Rochelle; Tuan Dinh
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.183

7.  Impact of pulmonary exacerbations and lung function on generic health-related quality of life in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Caitlyn T Solem; Montserrat Vera-Llonch; Sizhu Liu; Marc Botteman; Brenda Castiglione
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Cost-effectiveness of the CFTR gene-sequencing test for asymptomatic carriers in the Colombian population

Authors:  Ernesto Andrade; Jorge Díaz
Journal:  Biomedica       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 0.935

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.