Literature DB >> 8520332

Cost effectiveness of antenatal screening for cystic fibrosis.

H S Cuckle1, G A Richardson, T A Sheldon, P Quirke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost effectiveness of different antenatal screening programmes for cystic fibrosis.
SETTING: Antenatal clinics and general practices in the United Kingdom.
DESIGN: Four components of the screening process were identified: information giving, DNA testing, genetic counselling, and prenatal diagnosis. The component costs were derived from the literature and from a pilot screening study in Yorkshire. The cost of a given screening programme was then obtained by summing the components according to the specific screening strategy adopted (sequential and couple), the proportion of carriers detected by the DNA test, and the uptake of screening. Baseline assumptions were made about the proportion with missing information on carrier status from previous pregnancies (20%), the proportion changing partners between pregnancies (20%), and the uptake of prenatal diagnosis (100%). Sensitivity analysis was performed by varying these assumptions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cost per affected pregnancy detected.
RESULTS: Under the baseline assumptions sequential screening costs between pounds 40,000 and pounds 90,000 per affected pregnancy detected, depending on the carrier detection rate and uptake. Couple screening was more expensive, ranging from pounds 46,000 to pounds 104,000. From the sensitivity analysis a 10% change in the assumed proportion with missing information from a previous pregnancy alters the cost by pounds 4000; a 10% change in the proportion with new partners has a similar effect but only for couple screening; and cost will change directly in proportion to the uptake of prenatal diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: While economic analysis cannot determine screening policy, the paper provides the NHS with the information on cost effectiveness needed to inform decisions on the introduction of a screening service for cystic fibrosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8520332      PMCID: PMC2543729          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.7018.1460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  24 in total

1.  Costs and benefits of prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  A M Garber; J P Fenerty
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Evaluation of laboratory methods for cystic fibrosis carrier screening: reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and costs.

Authors:  Z H Miedzybrodzka; Z Yin; K F Kelly; N E Haites
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Stepwise or couple antenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis?: women's preferences and willingness to pay.

Authors:  Z Miedzybrodzka; J Semper; P Shackley; M Abdalla; C Donaldson
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: genetic analysis.

Authors:  B Kerem; J M Rommens; J A Buchanan; D Markiewicz; T K Cox; A Chakravarti; M Buchwald; L C Tsui
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-09-08       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Antenatal screening for carriers of cystic fibrosis: randomised trial of stepwise v couple screening.

Authors:  Z H Miedzybrodzka; M H Hall; J Mollison; A Templeton; I T Russell; J C Dean; K F Kelly; T M Marteau; N E Haites
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-02-11

6.  Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: cloning and characterization of complementary DNA.

Authors:  J R Riordan; J M Rommens; B Kerem; N Alon; R Rozmahel; Z Grzelczak; J Zielenski; S Lok; N Plavsic; J L Chou
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-09-08       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The cost-effectiveness of prenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  T A Lieu; S E Watson; A E Washington
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: chromosome walking and jumping.

Authors:  J M Rommens; M C Iannuzzi; B Kerem; M L Drumm; G Melmer; M Dean; R Rozmahel; J L Cole; D Kennedy; N Hidaka
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-09-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Active cascade testing for carriers of cystic fibrosis gene.

Authors:  M Super; M J Schwarz; G Malone; T Roberts; A Haworth; G Dermody
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-04

10.  Implementation of an antenatal serum screening programme for Down's syndrome in two districts (Brighton and Eastbourne). The Brighton and Eastbourne Down's Syndrome Screening Group.

Authors:  M Piggott; P Wilkinson; J Bennett
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.136

View more
  15 in total

1.  Costs, effects, and savings of screening for cystic fibrosis gene carriers.

Authors:  M F Wildhagen; H B Hilderink; J G Verzijl; J B Verheij; L Kooij; T Tijmstra; L P ten Kate; J D Habbema
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Screening asymptomatic people at high risk for hepatitis C. The case for.

Authors:  C A Seymour
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-25

3.  Genetic testing in the European Union: does economic evaluation matter?

Authors:  Fernando Antoñanzas; R Rodríguez-Ibeas; M F Hutter; R Lorente; C Juárez; M Pinillos
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-05-20

Review 4.  The new genetics. Implications for clinical services in Britain and the United States.

Authors:  A L Kinmonth; J Reinhard; M Bobrow; S Pauker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-07

5.  Genetic tests: a search for economy of scale.

Authors:  B Hillner
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Methods used in economic evaluations of prenatal screening are disputed.

Authors:  D J Torgerson; A Spencer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-03

7.  Cost effectiveness of antenatal screening for cystic fibrosis. Authors should have used marginal analysis.

Authors:  D J Torgerson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-04-06

8.  Cost effectiveness of antenatal screening for cystic fibrosis. Counselors do not have to be genetic nurse specialists.

Authors:  P Kent
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-04-06

9.  Cost effectiveness of antenatal screening for cystic fibrosis. Realistic cost must be established for genetic counselling in two step screening.

Authors:  D J Brock
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-04-06

10.  Influence of five years of antenatal screening on the paediatric cystic fibrosis population in one region.

Authors:  S Cunningham; T Marshall
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.