Literature DB >> 9756282

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection as a routine indication in low responder patients.

C Moreno1, A Ruiz, C Simón, A Pellicer, J Remohí.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine if a low response to gonadotrophin stimulation could be considered as an indication for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). This prospective study included a total of 96 non-male infertile couples with six or fewer retrieved oocytes, who underwent 104 in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles between January 1996 and April 1997. They were randomly divided into two groups for fertilization, one by IVF and the other by ICSI. Groups were compared in terms of fertilization rates, fertilization failure, embryo quality, embryos transferred and reproductive outcome. ICSI provided similar fertilization rates per inseminated oocyte (77.7 versus 70.2%) and per obtained oocyte (56.5 versus 58.8%) as IVF. Furthermore, equal numbers (2.2 versus 2.5) and quality of embryos were obtained and comparable pregnancy (21.1 versus 17.3%) and implantation (14.0 versus 11.1%) rates. Neither the number of retrieved oocytes, nor patient age was relevant for the fertilization rates obtained with both techniques. The number of cases with complete fertilization failure was similar in both procedures. We conclude that the technique of fertilization is not related to the reproductive outcome of low responders, and the routine use of ICSI is not indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9756282     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.8.2126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  14 in total

1.  Should ICSI be recommended routinely in patients with four or fewer oocytes retrieved?

Authors:  Martha Luna; Catherine Bigelow; Marlena Duke; Jane Ruman; Benjamin Sandler; Lawrence Grunfeld; Alan B Copperman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Role of ICSI in Non-male Factor Cycles as the Number of Oocytes Retrieved Decreases from Four to One.

Authors:  Na Guo; Xiang Hua; Yu-Feng Li; Lei Jin
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-15

Review 3.  Evaluation and treatment of low responders in assisted reproductive technology: a challenge to meet.

Authors:  S J Fasouliotis; A Simon; N Laufer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Live birth rates using conventional in vitro fertilization compared to intracytoplasmic sperm injection in Bologna poor responders with a single oocyte retrieved.

Authors:  Ioannis A Sfontouris; Efstratios M Kolibianakis; George T Lainas; Ram Navaratnarajah; Basil C Tarlatzis; Trifon G Lainas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Interval double transfer improves treatment success in patients with repeated IVF/ET failures.

Authors:  B Almog; I Levin; I Wagman; R Kapustiansky; T Schwartz; N Mey-Raz; A Amit; F Azem
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Assisted hatching and intracytoplasmic sperm injection are not associated with improved outcomes in assisted reproduction cycles for diminished ovarian reserve: an analysis of cycles in the United States from 2004 to 2011.

Authors:  Samantha F Butts; Carter Owen; Monica Mainigi; Suneeta Senapati; David B Seifer; Anuja Dokras
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-antagonist versus GnRH-agonist in ovarian stimulation of poor responders undergoing IVF.

Authors:  Sozos J Fasouliotis; Neri Laufer; Shelley Sabbagh-Ehrlich; Aby Lewin; Arye Hurwitz; Alex Simon
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Assisting in vitro fertilization by manipulating cumulus-oocyte-complexes either mechanically or enzymatically does not prevent IVF failure.

Authors:  Thomas Ebner; Marianne Moser; Omar Shebl; Richard Mayer; Gernot Tews
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-09-01

9.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional in vitro fertilization are complementary techniques in management of unexplained infertility.

Authors:  Kamal Jaroudi; Saad Al-Hassan; Hamad Al-Sufayan; Hind Al-Mayman; Meshal Qeba; Serdar Coskun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Clinical benefit of metaphase I oocytes.

Authors:  Leen Vanhoutte; Petra De Sutter; Josiane Van der Elst; Marc Dhont
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.