Literature DB >> 25758990

Live birth rates using conventional in vitro fertilization compared to intracytoplasmic sperm injection in Bologna poor responders with a single oocyte retrieved.

Ioannis A Sfontouris1, Efstratios M Kolibianakis, George T Lainas, Ram Navaratnarajah, Basil C Tarlatzis, Trifon G Lainas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare reproductive outcomes following conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in poor responders fulfilling the Bologna criteria, with a single oocyte retrieved.
METHODS: The present retrospective study included 243 Bologna poor responders with a single oocyte retrieved, who were categorized into three groups, depending on the fertilization method and semen quality (IVF non-male factor-IVF/NMF n = 101; ICSI non-male factor ICSI/NMF n = 50; ICSI male factor-ICSI/MF n = 92).
RESULTS: In IVF/NMF, ICSI/NMF and ICSI/MF similar fertilization rates [65.3, 66, 58.7%, respectively], proportions of embryo formation [63.4, 60, 53.3%, respectively], proportions of good quality embryos [54.7, 56.7, 57.1%, respectively], implantation rates [8.9, 10, 8.2% respectively] and live birth rates per oocyte retrieval [5.0, 4.0, 3.3%, respectively] were observed. Degeneration rate of oocytes due to mechanical damage was significantly higher after ICSI in the ICSI/NMF and ICSI/MF groups (8 and 6.5%, respectively) compared to IVF/NMF (0%) (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Conventional IVF and ICSI are associated with similar reproductive outcomes in poor responder patients with a single oocyte retrieved. Therefore, the choice of fertilization method should be based primarily on semen quality, in combination with the patient's previous history. A randomized controlled trial should be performed to confirm this study's findings that conventional IVF and ICSI have similar reproductive outcomes in poor responders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25758990      PMCID: PMC4429441          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0459-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  48 in total

1.  The status of controlled prospective clinical trials for efficacy of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in in vitro fertilization for non-male factor infertility.

Authors:  F Khamsi; Y Yavas; S Roberge; I C Lacanna; J C Wong; M Endman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases of in-vitro conception?

Authors:  S Fishel; I Aslam; F Lisi; L Rinaldi; J Timson; M Jacobson; L Gobetz; S Green; A Campbell; R Lisi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 3.  ICSI versus conventional techniques for oocyte insemination during IVF in patients with non-male factor subfertility: a Cochrane review.

Authors:  M M E van Rumste; J L H Evers; C M Farquhar
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 4.  Should ICSI be used in non-male factor infertility?

Authors:  Yasser Orief; Konstantinos Dafopoulos; Safaa Al-Hassani
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.828

5.  Modified natural cycle for IVF does not offer a realistic chance of parenthood in poor responders with high day 3 FSH levels, as a last resort prior to oocyte donation.

Authors:  Efstratios Kolibianakis; Kostantinos Zikopoulos; Michel Camus; Herman Tournaye; André Van Steirteghem; Paul Devroey
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not associated with poor outcome in couples with normal semen parameters and previous idiopathic fertilization failure in conventional in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  K Vicdan; A Z Işik
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Prospective controlled randomized study of in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the treatment of tubal factor infertility with normal semen parameters.

Authors:  M A Aboulghar; R T Mansour; G I Serour; Y M Amin; A Kamal
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  A C Van Steirteghem; Z Nagy; H Joris; J Liu; C Staessen; J Smitz; A Wisanto; P Devroey
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte.

Authors:  G Palermo; H Joris; P Devroey; A C Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-07-04       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  A review of ten years experience of ICSI.

Authors:  P Devroey; A Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 15.610

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  ALWAYS ICSI? A SWOT analysis.

Authors:  E Bosch; J J Espinós; F Fabregues; J Fontes; J García-Velasco; J Llácer; A Requena; M A Checa; J Bellver
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Role of ICSI in Non-male Factor Cycles as the Number of Oocytes Retrieved Decreases from Four to One.

Authors:  Na Guo; Xiang Hua; Yu-Feng Li; Lei Jin
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-15

3.  The effect of ICSI in infertility couples with non-male factor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ting Geng; Lin Cheng; Caiyun Ge; Yuanzhen Zhang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Comparison of ICSI and conventional IVF in non-male factor patients with less than four oocytes.

Authors:  Mete Isikoglu; Ayse Kendirci Ceviren; Tugba Cetin; Aysenur Avci; Batu Aydinuraz; Ozlem Karabay Akgul; Mehmet Karaca
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 5.  The effectiveness of ICSI versus conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  V Q Dang; L N Vuong; T M Ho; A N Ha; Q N Nguyen; B T Truong; Q T Pham; R Wang; R J Norman; B W Mol
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2019-03-27

6.  ICSI Does Not Improve Live Birth Rates but Yields Higher Cancellation Rates Than Conventional IVF in Unexplained Infertility.

Authors:  Jianyuan Song; Tingting Liao; Kaiyou Fu; Jian Xu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-02-10

7.  In vitro fertilisation (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients without severe male factor infertility: study protocol for the randomised, controlled, multicentre trial INVICSI.

Authors:  Sine Berntsen; Bugge Nøhr; Marie Louise Grøndahl; Morten Rønn Petersen; Lars Franch Andersen; Anne Lis Englund; Ulla Breth Knudsen; Lisbeth Prætorius; Anne Zedeler; Henriette Svarre Nielsen; Anja Pinborg; Nina La Cour Freiesleben
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Metabolomics for improving pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Charalampos S Siristatidis; Eleni Sertedaki; Dennis Vaidakis; Christos Varounis; Marialena Trivella
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-16

9.  ICSI Versus Conventional IVF in Women Aged 40 Years or More and Unexplained Infertility: A Retrospective Evaluation of 685 Cycles with Propensity Score Model.

Authors:  Gianluca Gennarelli; Andrea Carosso; Stefano Canosa; Claudia Filippini; Sara Cesarano; Carlotta Scarafia; Nicole Brunod; Alberto Revelli; Chiara Benedetto
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  More blastocysts are produced from fewer oocytes in ICSI  compared to IVF - results from a sibling oocytes study and definition of a new key performance indicator.

Authors:  Sandrine Chamayou; Carmen Ragolia; Carmelita Alecci; Giorgia Storaci; Simona Romano; Roberta Sapienza; Elena Maglia; Annalisa Liprino; Clementina Cardea; Michele Fichera; Antonino Guglielmino
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.