Literature DB >> 9756233

Triangulation in nursing research: issues of conceptual clarity and purpose.

F J Shih1.   

Abstract

The controversy concerning the value of qualitative, quantitative and triangulation approaches to nursing research for understanding human behaviour and increasing nursing knowledge has been an increasing source of debate among nurse scholars. However, the differences and similarities of these three perspectives have not been fully compared as either philosophies or methodologies. The purposes of this paper are to provide an understanding of the origin and development of the triangulation research method, clarify major sources of confusion in the presentation of a triangulation study, and discuss the problems and possible solutions of a triangulation study. Finally, an example of multiple triangulation in a nursing research within a Taiwanese cultural context -- turning points of recovery from cardiac surgery during the intensive care unit transition -- is presented. In the course of the paper, suggestions are also given to help nurse researchers recognize when it is most appropriate to use a certain research method, whether that be qualitative, quantitative or triangulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9756233     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00716.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  10 in total

1.  Methods for evaluation of small scale quality improvement projects.

Authors:  G Harvey; M Wensing
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-06

2.  Data governance requirements for distributed clinical research networks: triangulating perspectives of diverse stakeholders.

Authors:  Katherine K Kim; Dennis K Browe; Holly C Logan; Roberta Holm; Lori Hack; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Patient-centered outcomes on quality of life and anthroposophic healthcare: a qualitative triangulation study.

Authors:  Evi B Koster; Erik W Baars; Diana M J Delnoij
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Assessing the performance of imaging health systems in five selected hospitals in Uganda.

Authors:  Michael G Kawooya; George Pariyo; Elsie Kiguli Malwadde; Rosemary Byanyima; Harriet Kisembo
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2012-03-22

5.  Structural issues affecting mixed methods studies in health research: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Alicia O'Cathain; Jon Nicholl; Elizabeth Murphy
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Appraising risk in active surveillance of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anne Hogden; Kate Churruca; Frances Rapport; David Gillatt
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Building shared situational awareness in surgery through distributed dialog.

Authors:  Brigid M Gillespie; Karleen Gwinner; Nicole Fairweather; Wendy Chaboyer
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2013-03-20

8.  Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study.

Authors:  Brigid M Gillespie; Teresa K Withers; Joanne Lavin; Therese Gardiner; Andrea P Marshall
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2016-01-20

9.  Linking women experiencing incarceration to community-based HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis care: protocol of a pilot trial.

Authors:  Susan E Ramsey; Evan G Ames; Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein; Anne M Teitelman; Jennifer Clarke; Clair Kaplan
Journal:  Addict Sci Clin Pract       Date:  2019-03-04

10.  Dying and caring on the edge: Taiwan's surviving nurses' reflections on taking care of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Fu-Jin Shih; Meei-Ling Gau; Ching-Chiu Kao; Chyn-Yng Yang; Yaw-Sheng Lin; Yen-Chi Liao; Shuh-Jen Sheu
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.257

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.