Evi B Koster1, Erik W Baars2, Diana M J Delnoij3. 1. University of Applied Sciences Leiden, Zernikedreef 11, 2333 CK, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koster.e@hsleiden.nl. 2. University of Applied Sciences Leiden, Zernikedreef 11, 2333 CK, Leiden, The Netherlands. 3. Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Scientific Centre for Transformation in Care and Welfare (Tranzo), Tilburg University, Postbus 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To provide a qualitative investigation of aspects that matter to patients regarding quality of life (QOL) and other perceived treatment effects of anthroposophic healthcare (AH). It is a first step in the development of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for AH. Hence, it will contribute to the evaluation of AH quality from patients' perspectives. METHOD: Within-method triangulation of four qualitative data sources is: (1) Survey of 2063 patients of AH general practitioners; single open item; (2) Survey of 34 patients of AH nurses; single open item; (3) and (4) Sixteen semi-structured interviews with patients. The data sources contained patients' qualitative reports on contribution of treatment to QOL, other perceived treatment effects and/or quality of care aspects. Content analysis Construction of items and domains by open, axial and selective coding. RESULTS: Twelve domains regarding quality of life are found: Recovery/Symptom reduction, Active contribution/Autonomy, General well-being, Meaning, Rest/Relaxation, Functioning, Energy/Strength, Care relationship, Natural healing, Mindful inner attitude, Being well informed and Social relations. The interviews demonstrate relations between domains. CONCLUSIONS: The findings give a comprehensive insight into aspects of care that are relevant to patients, providing a first step to develop PROMs for AH. Findings show a broadening of domains compared to existing measurement instruments and show close similarities with the recently developed concept of "positive health." Extending QOL instruments with a broader set of domains would give concrete tools to improve evaluation of quality of care and make this evaluation more in line with aspects that matter to AH patients.
PURPOSE: To provide a qualitative investigation of aspects that matter to patients regarding quality of life (QOL) and other perceived treatment effects of anthroposophic healthcare (AH). It is a first step in the development of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for AH. Hence, it will contribute to the evaluation of AH quality from patients' perspectives. METHOD: Within-method triangulation of four qualitative data sources is: (1) Survey of 2063 patients of AH general practitioners; single open item; (2) Survey of 34 patients of AH nurses; single open item; (3) and (4) Sixteen semi-structured interviews with patients. The data sources contained patients' qualitative reports on contribution of treatment to QOL, other perceived treatment effects and/or quality of care aspects. Content analysis Construction of items and domains by open, axial and selective coding. RESULTS: Twelve domains regarding quality of life are found: Recovery/Symptom reduction, Active contribution/Autonomy, General well-being, Meaning, Rest/Relaxation, Functioning, Energy/Strength, Care relationship, Natural healing, Mindful inner attitude, Being well informed and Social relations. The interviews demonstrate relations between domains. CONCLUSIONS: The findings give a comprehensive insight into aspects of care that are relevant to patients, providing a first step to develop PROMs for AH. Findings show a broadening of domains compared to existing measurement instruments and show close similarities with the recently developed concept of "positive health." Extending QOL instruments with a broader set of domains would give concrete tools to improve evaluation of quality of care and make this evaluation more in line with aspects that matter to AHpatients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anthroposophic healthcare; Patient reported outcomes measures; Patient-centered care; Qualitative triangulation; Quality of care; Quality of life
Authors: Harald J Hamre; Michael Fischer; Marianne Heger; David Riley; Max Haidvogl; Erik Baars; Eileen Bristol; Michael Evans; Reinhard Schwarz; Helmut Kiene Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: N K Aaronson; M Muller; P D Cohen; M L Essink-Bot; M Fekkes; R Sanderman; M A Sprangers; A te Velde; E Verrips Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Machteld Huber; J André Knottnerus; Lawrence Green; Henriëtte van der Horst; Alejandro R Jadad; Daan Kromhout; Brian Leonard; Kate Lorig; Maria Isabel Loureiro; Jos W M van der Meer; Paul Schnabel; Richard Smith; Chris van Weel; Henk Smid Journal: BMJ Date: 2011-07-26
Authors: Evi B Koster; Rob R S Ong; Rachel Heybroek; Diana M J Delnoij; Erik W Baars Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: G S Kienle; E Ben-Arye; B Berger; C Cuadrado Nahum; T Falkenberg; G Kapócs; H Kiene; D Martin; U Wolf; H Szöke Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 2.629