Literature DB >> 9756225

Women's lay knowledge of cervical cancer/cervical screening: accounting for non-attendance at cervical screening clinics.

A Neilson1, R K Jones.   

Abstract

An assessment of women's knowledge of cervical screening and cervical cancer was considered important as up to 92% of those dying from this form of cancer had never been tested. What were the reasons which determined their non-attendance? Issues to be addressed were reactions to invitation, women's knowledge of screening, and the possible factors which they envisaged as being associated with cervical cancer. Other issues to be considered were practical problems associated with attendance, and preference for the sex and professional status of the health professionals involved; 187 women in a general practitioner practice in Lothian, Scotland were targeted by questionnaire. As with other studies in this field 50% of those contacted were ineligible for a variety of reasons. Seventy-two women completed the questionnaire, providing a mix of qualitative and quantitative data. Although the majority of women felt the invitation to attend screening was clear and easy to understand, there was a lack of knowledge with regard to both the screening itself and the possible causes of cervical cancer. The main 'causes' were seen as higher sexual activity among those aged under 37 and smoking and a virus by those over 37. The majority of women showed preference for a female professional to take the smear. Practical problems of time and venue were not considered insurmountable. The main reasons cited for non-compliance were the fear and dislike of the test itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9756225     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00728.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  5 in total

1.  Avoiding piecemeal research on participation in cervical cancer screening: the advantages of a social identity framework.

Authors:  Candice Tribe; Janine Webb
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  "I'd rather go and know": women's understanding and experience of DEXA scanning for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jane C Richardson; Andrew B Hassell; Elaine M Hay; Elaine Thomas
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Adverse outcomes after colposcopy.

Authors:  Sarah M Flanagan; Sue Wilson; David Luesley; Sarah L Damery; Sheila M Greenfield
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Lessons learned from the "Goodie Box": A message design study developed and evaluated in community settings for cervical cancer prevention.

Authors:  Soroya Julian McFarlane; Susan E Morgan; Nick Carcioppolo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Cervical cancer screening service utilisation in UK.

Authors:  Alexander Labeit; Frank Peinemann; Abbi Kedir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.