OBJECTIVE: To explore women's knowledge and understanding of osteoporosis and of dual energy x-ray absorptiometer (DEXA) scans; the factors influencing their decision to have a scan and their experience of undergoing a DEXA scan. DESIGN: In-depth interviews (using a topic guide) were carried out with 12 women [before a DEXA scan and after they had discussed the results with their general practitioner (GP)] and with three women who chose not to have a scan. SETTING: Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Women who responded to a primary-care based questionnaire were purposively selected for interview. RESULTS: The women interviewed had varied levels of understanding of osteoporosis. For the majority of participants the scan was an overwhelmingly positive experience, despite some women's negative expectations. Findings are also explored in terms of the influences on women's decision-making about whether to have a scan and the concept of "knowing" one's risk status. CONCLUSIONS: The main implication for primary care is how to improve women's understanding of osteoporosis and DEXA scans in order to promote the strategy of scanning high-risk women.
OBJECTIVE: To explore women's knowledge and understanding of osteoporosis and of dual energy x-ray absorptiometer (DEXA) scans; the factors influencing their decision to have a scan and their experience of undergoing a DEXA scan. DESIGN: In-depth interviews (using a topic guide) were carried out with 12 women [before a DEXA scan and after they had discussed the results with their general practitioner (GP)] and with three women who chose not to have a scan. SETTING: Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Women who responded to a primary-care based questionnaire were purposively selected for interview. RESULTS: The women interviewed had varied levels of understanding of osteoporosis. For the majority of participants the scan was an overwhelmingly positive experience, despite some women's negative expectations. Findings are also explored in terms of the influences on women's decision-making about whether to have a scan and the concept of "knowing" one's risk status. CONCLUSIONS: The main implication for primary care is how to improve women's understanding of osteoporosis and DEXA scans in order to promote the strategy of scanning high-risk women.
Authors: P Chotiyarnwong; E V McCloskey; N C Harvey; M Lorentzon; D Prieto-Alhambra; B Abrahamsen; J D Adachi; F Borgström; O Bruyere; J J Carey; P Clark; C Cooper; E M Curtis; E Dennison; M Diaz-Curiel; H P Dimai; D Grigorie; M Hiligsmann; P Khashayar; E M Lewiecki; P Lips; R S Lorenc; S Ortolani; A Papaioannou; S Silverman; M Sosa; P Szulc; K A Ward; N Yoshimura; J A Kanis Journal: Arch Osteoporos Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 2.879
Authors: Christian D Mallen; George Peat; Elaine Thomas; Simon Wathall; Tracy Whitehurst; Charlotte Clements; Joanne Bailey; Jacqueline Gray; Peter R Croft Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2006-11-10 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Rizky Suganda Prawiradilaga; Victoria Gunmalm; Trine Lund-Jacobsen; Eva Wulff Helge; Charlotte Brøns; Michael Andersson; Peter Schwarz Journal: J Osteoporos Date: 2018-10-04
Authors: Jude des Bordes; Seema Prasad; Greg Pratt; Maria E Suarez-Almazor; Maria A Lopez-Olivo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-01-15 Impact factor: 3.240