Literature DB >> 9753369

Natural background radiation and cancer death in Rocky Mountain states and Gulf Coast states.

J Jagger.   

Abstract

Calculations based on data from NCRP reports show that the average level of natural background radiation (NBR) in Rocky Mountain states is 3.2 times that in Gulf Coast states. However, data from the American Cancer Society show that age-adjusted overall cancer death in Gulf Coast states is actually 1.26 times higher than in Rocky Mountain states. The difference from proportionality is a factor of 4.0. This is a clear negative correlation of NBR with overall cancer death. It is also shown that, comparing 3 Rocky Mountain states and 3 Gulf Coast states, there is a strong negative correlation of estimated lung cancer mortality with natural radon levels (factors of 5.7 to 7.5).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9753369     DOI: 10.1097/00004032-199810000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  15 in total

Review 1.  Hormesis, an update of the present position.

Authors:  Lennart Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  On "phantom risks" associated with diagnostic ionizing radiation: evidence in support of revising radiography standards and regulations in chiropractic.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Donald D Harrison; Deed E Harrison; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2005-12

3.  Evidence-based protocol for structural rehabilitation of the spine and posture: review of clinical biomechanics of posture (CBP) publications.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Donald D Harrison; Deed E Harrison; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2005-12

4.  Smoking and hormesis as confounding factors in radiation pulmonary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Cancer mortality, state mean elevations, and other selected predictors.

Authors:  John Hart; Seunggeun Hyun
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Land elevation and cancer mortality in u.s. Cities and counties using median elevations derived from geographic information systems.

Authors:  John Hart
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Immunological mechanism of the low-dose radiation-induced suppression of cancer metastases in a mouse model.

Authors:  Ewa M Nowosielska; Aneta Cheda; Jolanta Wrembel-Wargocka; Marek K Janiak
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Radiation hormesis: historical perspective and implications for low-dose cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Alexander M Vaiserman
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Mean cancer mortality rates in low versus high elevation counties in Texas.

Authors:  John Hart
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Cancer mortality in six lowest versus six highest elevation jurisdictions in the u.s.

Authors:  John Hart
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.