Literature DB >> 21431077

Cancer mortality in six lowest versus six highest elevation jurisdictions in the u.s.

John Hart1.   

Abstract

Low levels of background radiation exist around us continuously. These levels increase with increasing land elevation, allowing a comparison of low elevations to high elevations in regard to an outcome such as cancer death rates. The present study compares archived cancer mortality rates in six low versus six high elevation jurisdictions. The study also compares mortality rates for all causes, heart disease, and diabetes in low versus high elevation jurisdictions in an effort to see if other mortality outcomes are different in low versus high elevations. Statistically significant decreases in mortality, with very large effect sizes, were observed in high land elevation for three of the four outcomes, including cancer. One possible explanation for the decreased mortality in high elevation jurisdictions is radiation hormesis. Another possible explanation, at least in the case of heart disease mortality, is the physiologic responses that accompany higher elevations regarding decreased oxygen levels. Since this is an ecological study, no causal inferences can be made, particularly when viewpoints on possible effects of low level radiation are diametrically opposed. Further research is indicated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiation effects; background radiation; cancer; mortality

Year:  2010        PMID: 21431077      PMCID: PMC3057635          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.09-051.Hart

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  18 in total

1.  Population study in the high natural background radiation area in Kerala, India.

Authors:  M K Nair; K S Nambi; N S Amma; P Gangadharan; P Jayalekshmi; S Jayadevan; V Cherian; K N Reghuram
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Deaths: final data for 2003.

Authors:  Donna L Hoyert; Melonie P Heron; Sherry L Murphy; Hsiang-Ching Kung
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2006-04-19

3.  Effects of exposure to altitude on men with coronary artery disease and impaired left ventricular function.

Authors:  J Erdmann; K T Sun; P Masar; H Niederhauser
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries.

Authors:  E Cardis; M Vrijheid; M Blettner; E Gilbert; M Hakama; C Hill; G Howe; J Kaldor; C R Muirhead; M Schubauer-Berigan; T Yoshimura; F Bermann; G Cowper; J Fix; C Hacker; B Heinmiller; M Marshall; I Thierry-Chef; D Utterback; Y-O Ahn; E Amoros; P Ashmore; A Auvinen; J-M Bae; J Bernar Solano; A Biau; E Combalot; P Deboodt; A Diez Sacristan; M Eklof; H Engels; G Engholm; G Gulis; R Habib; K Holan; H Hyvonen; A Kerekes; J Kurtinaitis; H Malker; M Martuzzi; A Mastauskas; A Monnet; M Moser; M S Pearce; D B Richardson; F Rodriguez-Artalejo; A Rogel; H Tardy; M Telle-Lamberton; I Turai; M Usel; K Veress
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-29

5.  Altitude, radiation, and mortality from cancer and heart disease.

Authors:  C R Weinberg; K G Brown; D G Hoel
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 6.  Human exposure to high natural background radiation: what can it teach us about radiation risks?

Authors:  Jolyon H Hendry; Steven L Simon; Andrzej Wojcik; Mehdi Sohrabi; Werner Burkart; Elisabeth Cardis; Dominique Laurier; Margot Tirmarche; Isamu Hayata
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 1.394

7.  Update on linear non-threshold dose-response model and implications for diagnostic radiology procedures.

Authors:  R Julian Preston
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  Natural background radiation and cancer mortality in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  S P Allwright; P A Colgan; I R McAulay; E Mullins
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Radiation hormesis: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Authors:  T D Luckey
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Richard Doll; Dudley T Goodhead; Eric J Hall; Charles E Land; John B Little; Jay H Lubin; Dale L Preston; R Julian Preston; Jerome S Puskin; Elaine Ron; Rainer K Sachs; Jonathan M Samet; Richard B Setlow; Marco Zaider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  8 in total

1.  Cancer mortality for a single race in low versus high elevation counties in the u.s.

Authors:  John Hart
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Reduced Lung Cancer Mortality With Lower Atmospheric Pressure.

Authors:  Ray M Merrill; Aaron Frutos
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Lower mortality rates in those living at moderate altitude.

Authors:  Martin Burtscher
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2016-10-02       Impact factor: 5.682

4.  Cancer risk associated with living at high altitude in Ecuadorian population from 2005 to 2014.

Authors:  David Israel Garrido; Santiago Moises Garrido
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2018-04-25

Review 5.  Health Impacts of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation: Current Scientific Debates and Regulatory Issues.

Authors:  Alexander Vaiserman; Alexander Koliada; Oksana Zabuga; Yehoshua Socol
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Are Restrictive Medical Radiation Imaging Campaigns Misguided? It Seems So: A Case Example of the American Chiropractic Association's Adoption of "Choosing Wisely".

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Deed E Harrison
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Background radiation impacts human longevity and cancer mortality: reconsidering the linear no-threshold paradigm.

Authors:  Elroei David; Marina Wolfson; Vadim E Fraifeld
Journal:  Biogerontology       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.277

8.  Association Between Air Temperature and Cancer Death Rates in Florida: An Ecological Study.

Authors:  John Hart
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.658

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.