Literature DB >> 11874258

Power issues in the doctor-patient relationship.

F Goodyear-Smith1, S Buetow.   

Abstract

Power is an inescapable aspect of all social relationships, and inherently is neither good nor evil. Doctors need power to fulfil their professional obligations to multiple constituencies including patients, the community and themselves. Patients need power to formulate their values, articulate and achieve health needs, and fulfil their responsibilities. However, both parties can use or misuse power. The ethical effectiveness of a health system is maximised by empowering doctors and patients to develop 'adult-adult' rather than 'adult-child' relationships that respect and enable autonomy, accountability, fidelity and humanity. Even in adult-adult relationships, conflicts and complexities arise. Lack of concordance between doctors and patients can encourage paternalism but may be best resolved through negotiated care. A further area of conflict involves the 'double agency' of doctors for both patients and the community. Empowerment of all players is not always possible but is most likely where each party considers and acknowledges power issues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11874258     DOI: 10.1023/A:1013812802937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  36 in total

Review 1.  Some implications for the study of the doctor-patient interaction: power, structure, and agency in the works of Howard Waitzkin and Arthur Kleinman.

Authors:  G Pappas
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Four strategies for negotiated care.

Authors:  S Buetow
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Discretionary power, lies, and broken trust: justification and discomfort.

Authors:  N Potter
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1996-12

4.  Professional dominance or proletarianization?: neither.

Authors:  V Navarro
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  An ethical perspective on health care insurance reform.

Authors:  T A Brennan
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  1993

6.  Patient satisfaction: a valid concept?

Authors:  B Williams
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Patients' Perceived Involvement in Care Scale: relationship to attitudes about illness and medical care.

Authors:  C E Lerman; D S Brody; G C Caputo; D G Smith; C G Lazaro; H G Wolfson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Patient empowerment. Results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  R M Anderson; M M Funnell; P M Butler; M S Arnold; J T Fitzgerald; C C Feste
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Responsibility to or for in the physician-patient relationship?

Authors:  R C McMillan
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 10.  The scope for the involvement of patients in their consultations with health professionals: rights, responsibilities and preferences of patients.

Authors:  S Buetow
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.903

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Implicit normativity in evidence-based medicine: a plea for integrated empirical ethics research.

Authors:  A C Molewijk; A M Stiggelbout; W Otten; H M Dupuis; J Kievit
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-03

2.  Ethical concerns in community practice research. Common concerns encountered by the Alberta family practice research network.

Authors:  Donna P Manca; Peggy Maher; Roseanne Gallant
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  "I Don't Like Being Stereotyped, I Decided I Was Never Going Back to the Doctor": Sexual Healthcare Access Among Young Latina Women in Alabama.

Authors:  Mercedes M Morales-Alemán; Gwendolyn Ferreti; Isabel C Scarinci
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2020-08

4.  To care is to coprovide.

Authors:  Stephen A Buetow
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  The patient and the computer in the primary care consultation.

Authors:  Christopher Pearce; Michael Arnold; Christine Phillips; Stephen Trumble; Kathryn Dwan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  Cervical Cancer Screening for Patients on the Female-to-Male Spectrum: a Narrative Review and Guide for Clinicians.

Authors:  Jennifer Potter; Sarah M Peitzmeier; Ida Bernstein; Sari L Reisner; Natalie M Alizaga; Madina Agénor; Dana J Pardee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Non-maleficence and the ethics of consent to cancer screening.

Authors:  Lotte Elton
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Qualitative insights into practice time management: does 'patient-centred time' in practice management offer a portal to improved access?

Authors:  S Buetow; V Adair; G Coster; M Hight; B Gribben; E Mitchell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Enacting power and constructing gender in cervical cancer screening encounters between transmasculine patients and health care providers.

Authors:  Sarah M Peitzmeier; Ida M Bernstein; Michal J McDowell; Dana J Pardee; Madina Agénor; Natalie M Alizaga; Sari L Reisner; Jennifer Potter
Journal:  Cult Health Sex       Date:  2019-10-29

10.  A 41-year-old African American man with poorly controlled hypertension: review of patient and physician factors related to hypertension treatment adherence.

Authors:  Lisa A Cooper
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.