Literature DB >> 24368580

Clinical ethics and patient advocacy: the power of communication in health care.

Inken Annegret Emrich1, Leyla Fröhlich-Güzelsoy, Florian Bruns, Bernd Friedrich, Andreas Frewer.   

Abstract

In recent years, the rights of patients have assumed a more pivotal role in international discussion. Stricter laws on the protection of patients place greater priority on the perspective and the status of patients. The purpose of this study is to emphasize ethical aspects in communication, the role of patient advocates as contacts for the concerns and suggestions of patients, and how many problems of ethics disappear when communication is highlighted. We reviewed 680 documented cases of consultation in a 10-year period of patient advocates' activity at a big German university hospital with 1,300 beds. On the basis of this extensive material, the article will focus on the intersection of the advocate's work with the problems of patients in hospitals. Deficits in the level of communication between health care professionals and patients were frequently uncovered. Patients primarily complain about the lack of dialogue and empathy. Middle-aged patients consulted the patients' advocate disproportionately more often. Measured against this baseline, the group of 65 and older complained less frequently. Besides complaints the advocate was asked in more than one-third of all cases for information about medical matters, hospital regulations or administrative problems. Patients obviously see the advocate as a well-connected and ideally unbiased contact person for uncertainties concerning their malady or a potential stay in hospital. Those seeking help often set hope in the information given by the voluntary patient representative. It should be highly recommended for every German hospital to establish the position of a patient advocate. Furthermore, patients can profit from regular exchange between the advocate and the Ethics Committee, also, to help ensure that their rights are taken into account and implemented in an ethically desirable context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24368580     DOI: 10.1007/s10730-013-9225-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HEC Forum        ISSN: 0956-2737


  21 in total

1.  [Patient autonomy--a critical concept analysis].

Authors:  L S Geisler
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 0.628

2.  The age-indifference principle and equality.

Authors:  John Harris
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  What do we really know about patient satisfaction?

Authors:  C Carolyn Thiedke
Journal:  Fam Pract Manag       Date:  2007-01

Review 4.  Uncertainty, responsibility, and the evolution of the physician/patient relationship.

Authors:  M S Henry
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Medical technology assessment and ethics. Ambivalent relations.

Authors:  H A ten Have
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

6.  What do patients expect from their physicians? Qualitative research on the ethical aspects of patient statements.

Authors:  Mehmet Cetin; Muharrem Uçar; Tolga Güven; Adnan Ataç; Mustafa Ozer
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Ethical theory, ethnography, and differences between doctors and nurses in approaches to patient care.

Authors:  D W Robertson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  The principle of justice in patient priorities in the intensive care unit: the role of significant others.

Authors:  K Halvorsen; R Førde; P Nortvedt
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  [Medical decision making in hospital--results of an exploratory study on the value of shared decision making from the physicians point of view].

Authors:  J Ernst; S Holze; C Sonnefeld; H Götze; R Schwarz
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2007-04

Review 10.  The scope for the involvement of patients in their consultations with health professionals: rights, responsibilities and preferences of patients.

Authors:  S Buetow
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.903

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Accessibility of Inpatient Pediatric Ethics Consultation Services to Patient Caregivers.

Authors:  Shiven Sharma; Meaghann S Weaver; Jennifer K Walter
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-01

2.  Patient advocacy from the clinical nurses' viewpoint: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shirmohammad Davoodvand; Abbas Abbaszadeh; Fazlollah Ahmadi
Journal:  J Med Ethics Hist Med       Date:  2016-06-11

3.  Clinical ethics consultations in psychiatric compared to non-psychiatric medical settings: characteristics and outcomes.

Authors:  T Löbbing; S Carvalho Fernando; M Driessen; M Schulz; J Behrens; K K B Kobert
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-01-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.