Literature DB >> 9750545

Adduction arytenopexy: a new procedure for paralytic dysphonia with implications for implant medialization.

S M Zeitels1, I Hochman, R E Hillman.   

Abstract

Arytenoid adduction was designed to enhance posterior glottal closure in patients with paralytic dysphonia by reproducing lateral cricoarytenoid muscle function. However this procedure can exaggerate normal medial rotation of the vocal process, because the agonist-antagonist function of the interarytenoid, lateral thyroarytenoid, and posterior cricoarytenoid muscles is not simulated. Therefore, a new adduction procedure (adduction arytenopexy) was devised to affix the arytenoid on the cricoid facet in a more optimal position for glottal sound production. The adduction arytenopexy procedure was designed on fresh cadavers. In this technique, the lateral aspect of the cricoarytenoid joint is opened widely and the body of the arytenoid is manually medialized along the cricoid facet. A specially designed single suture is then placed through the posterior cricoid and the body or the muscular process of the arytenoid to achieve 2-point fixation. This draws the arytenoid posteriorly, superiorly, and medially for precise positioning. The arytenoid is rocked internally on the cricoid facet, and suture tension is adjusted appropriately to simulate normal cricoarytenoid adduction. In the first study, the adduction arytenopexy was compared with the classic arytenoid adduction in 10 fresh cadaver larynges. The new arytenopexy procedure resulted in an average increase of 2.1 mm (p < .01) in the length of the musculomembranous vocal fold, whereas the classic arytenoid adduction did not reveal a significant change in length. Additionally, the adduction arytenopexy resulted in a consistently higher vocal fold and a more normally contoured arytenoid than the classic adduction procedure. The second study consisted of a clinical trial in which 12 patients, who presented with a widely patent posterior glottis, underwent adduction arytenopexy in conjunction with implant medialization. The procedure was successful in all patients, and there were minimal complications. In the third study, preoperative and postoperative vocal assessment measures (stroboscopic, aerodynamic, acoustic, and perceptual) were analyzed in 9 of the 12 patients. The most striking preoperative stroboscopic observation was that 8 of the 9 patients presented with an aperiodic vibrational flutter during phonation due to severe valvular incompetence. Postoperatively, all patients developed complete closure of the glottal chink and effective entrained oscillation of the vocal folds. This visual improvement in function was commensurate with comparable changes in most of the other objective and subjective measures of vocal function. The new adduction arytenopexy procedure closely simulates the biomechanics underlying normal glottal closure and cricoarytenoid adduction. In turn, complex implant design shapes are not necessary to achieve proper alignment of the arytenoid and the vocal fold. Because the arytenoid is properly positioned prior to the medialization, implants can be sized more precisely and are unencumbered by an anterior thyroid lamina suture. These procedural innovations resulted in enhanced entrained oscillation of the glottal valve and, in turn, improved laryngeal sound production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9750545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl        ISSN: 0096-8056


  16 in total

1.  [Adjuvants in operative laryngology].

Authors:  C Sittel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Objective measurement of real time subglottic pressure during medialization thyroplasty: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Nayla Matar; Marc Remacle; Vincent Bachy; Georges Lawson; Antoine Giovanni; Vinciane Lejoly-Devuyst; Thierry Legou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Impact of Nonmodal Phonation on Estimates of Subglottal Pressure From Neck-Surface Acceleration in Healthy Speakers.

Authors:  Katherine L Marks; Jonathan Z Lin; Annie B Fox; Laura E Toles; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Estimation of Subglottal Pressure From Neck Surface Vibration in Patients With Voice Disorders.

Authors:  Katherine L Marks; Jonathan Z Lin; James A Burns; Tiffiny A Hron; Robert E Hillman; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Sling arytenoid adduction.

Authors:  Markus Hess; Daniel Schroeder; Klaus Püschel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Videostroboscopic assessment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis after augmentation with autologous fascia.

Authors:  Heikki Rihkanen; Petri Reijonen; Sari Lehikoinen-Söderlund; Eija-Riitta Lauri
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  [Surgical voice rehabilitation in unilateral vocal fold paralysis].

Authors:  C Sittel; N Bosch; P K Plinkert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Improved subglottal pressure estimation from neck-surface vibration in healthy speakers producing non-modal phonation.

Authors:  Jon Z Lin; Víctor M Espinoza; Katherine L Marks; Matías Zañartu; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 6.856

9.  Modulating phonation through alteration of vocal fold medial surface contour.

Authors:  Ted Mau; Joseph Muhlestein; Sean Callahan; Roger W Chan
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Estimating Subglottal Pressure From Neck-Surface Acceleration During Normal Voice Production.

Authors:  Amanda S Fryd; Jarrad H Van Stan; Robert E Hillman; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.