Literature DB >> 12942240

Videostroboscopic assessment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis after augmentation with autologous fascia.

Heikki Rihkanen1, Petri Reijonen, Sari Lehikoinen-Söderlund, Eija-Riitta Lauri.   

Abstract

Vocal fold augmentation by injection laryngoplasty is a simple and fast procedure. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the glottal closure and the travelling mucosal wave by videostroboscopic images after autologous fascia augmentation in unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) with a special reference to objective analysis of voice. A total of 14 UVFP patients with poor voice and open glottal gap were assessed by videostroboscopy, blinded perceptual evaluation of running speech and acoustical analysis of sustained vowel. Data were collected before the procedure and at a supplementary evaluation 5-32 months (mean: 13 months) after injection of autologous fascia deep into the paralysed vocal fold. Mean age was 59 years; there were eight women and six men. Frame-by-frame video analysis revealed that before the operation 10 out of 12 had large glottal gaps without any contact between vocal folds on phonation. After the procedure seven gaps were completely closed, four partly, and two had no mucosal contact in stroboscopic examination. Maximum gap between vocal folds decreased from 7.21 units to 1.65 units (paired t-test P<0.001). Mucosal wave amplitude symmetry and phase synchrony were present in most subjects with partial closure and phase synchrony in every patient with a proper glottic closure. A panel of listeners rated voice to be significantly better ( P<0.01) ) after the procedure, and the improvement in acoustical parameters was also statistically significant ( P<0.01). There was a good correlation between objective voice analysis and videostroboscopy. Residual glottal gap was the major reason for less than optimal postoperative voice. No signs of hampered mucosal wave were noticed. Videostroboscopy and objective voice analysis suggest that augmentation by autologous fascia does not induce scar or fibrous tissue in the subepithelial space. Slight over-correction should be attempted initially in order to accomplish sufficient augmentation. This might enhance complete glottic closure and improve the outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12942240     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-003-0642-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  24 in total

1.  Vocal cord augmentation with autogenous fat.

Authors:  J H Brandenburg; W Kirkham; D Koschkee
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Autologous fat injection for unilateral vocal fold paralysis.

Authors:  M L Shindo; L S Zaretsky; D H Rice
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Autologous fat implantation for vocal fold scar: a preliminary report.

Authors:  R T Sataloff; J R Spiegel; M Hawkshaw; D C Rosen; R J Heuer
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Acoustic, perceptual, aerodynamic and anatomical correlations in voice pathology.

Authors:  P H Dejonckere; J Lebacq
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.538

5.  Histology of injected autologous fascia in the paralyzed canine vocal fold.

Authors:  P Reijonen; I Leivo; T Nevalainen; H Rihkanen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Quantitative videostroboscopic measurement of glottal gap and vocal function: an analysis of thyroplasty type I.

Authors:  K Omori; A Kacker; D H Slavit; S M Blaugrund
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Correlation between stroboscopy and electromyography in laryngeal paralysis.

Authors:  J Kokesh; P W Flint; L R Robinson; C W Cummings
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Voice acoustics after autologous fascia injection for vocal fold paralysis.

Authors:  H Rihkanen; S Lehikoinen-Söderlund; P Reijonen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Videostroboscopy of human vocal fold paralysis.

Authors:  J A Sercarz; G S Berke; Y Ming; B R Gerratt; M Natividad
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Videostroboscopy of the canine larynx: the effects of asymmetric laryngeal tension.

Authors:  D M Moore; G S Berke; D G Hanson; P H Ward
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Ten must know pseudolesions of the head and neck.

Authors:  Neethu Gopal; Alok A Bhatt
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2020-06-18

2.  CT assessment of vocal cord medialization.

Authors:  V A Kumar; J S Lewin; L E Ginsberg
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  [Vocal fold augmentation].

Authors:  C Sittel; P K Plinkert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  Advances in laryngeal imaging.

Authors:  Antanas Verikas; Virgilijus Uloza; Marija Bacauskiene; Adas Gelzinis; Edgaras Kelertas
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-07-19       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  [Treatment of glottal gap].

Authors:  S Voigt-Zimmermann; C Arens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Treatment of vocal fold immobility by injectable homologous collagen: short-term results.

Authors:  Marc Remacle; Georges Lawson; Jacques Jamart; Monique Delos
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Parameters and Scales Used to Assess and Report Findings From Stroboscopy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Maude Desjardins; Kendrea L Garand; Bonnie Martin-Harris
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Vocal fold augmentation with injectable polycaprolactone microspheres/pluronic F127 hydrogel: long-term in vivo study for the treatment of glottal insufficiency.

Authors:  Seong Keun Kwon; Hee-Bok Kim; Jae-Jun Song; Chang Gun Cho; Seok-Won Park; Jong-Sun Choi; Junsun Ryu; Se Heang Oh; Jin Ho Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.