Literature DB >> 22159915

Objective measurement of real time subglottic pressure during medialization thyroplasty: a feasibility study.

Nayla Matar1, Marc Remacle, Vincent Bachy, Georges Lawson, Antoine Giovanni, Vinciane Lejoly-Devuyst, Thierry Legou.   

Abstract

It is hypothesized that real time objective measurement of the subglottic pressure could contribute to the choice of the implant's size (IS) in medialization thyroplasty (MT). A prospective study was conducted with patients with glottal insufficiency. Patients had a MT using a Montgomery implant(®) (Boston medical, Boston, USA). Peak direct subglottic pressure (PDSGP) was measured intraoperatively using a catheter inserted in the cricothyroid membrane. The implant's choice was based on the results of PDSGP measured prior and after placement of the implant and was compared to the surgeon's and patient's perception and fiber optic estimation of the glottis aperture. Six patients were included in the first part of the study. The PDSGP could be measured in all the patients without increasing the surgical time or patients' discomfort. The mean PDSGP before and after the placement of the implant was 15.2 (SD = 5) and 10.6 (SD = 4) cmH(2)O, respectively. In the second part of the study, five patients were included. The PDSGP varied with the size of the implant and the implant with the lowest pressure was chosen in 4/5 patients. Peroperative measurement of PDSGP is easy, feasible and might allow a more objective choice of the IS in MT. Level of evidence 2c.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22159915     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1867-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  21 in total

1.  Estimated subglottic pressure in normal and dysphonic subjects.

Authors:  A Giovanni; C Heim; D Demolin; J M Triglia
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Objective voice analysis for dysphonic patients: a multiparametric protocol including acoustic and aerodynamic measurements.

Authors:  P Yu; M Ouaknine; J Revis; A Giovanni
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Objective voice quality analysis before and after onset of unilateral vocal fold paralysis.

Authors:  D M Hartl; S Hans; J Vaissière; M Riquet; D F Brasnu
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Objective acoustic and aerodynamic measures of breathiness in paralytic dysphonia.

Authors:  DanaJ A M Hartl; Stéphane Hans; Jacqueline Vaissière; DanielJ A M F Brasnu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2002-10-18       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Optimal arytenoid adduction based on quantitative real-time voice analysis.

Authors:  Matthew R Hoffman; Ketan Surender; William J Chapin; Rachel E Witt; Timothy M McCulloch; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Vocal fold augmentation with calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA).

Authors:  Clark A Rosen; Jackie Gartner-Schmidt; Roy Casiano; Timothy D Anderson; Felicia Johnson; Lee Reussner; Marc Remacle; Robert T Sataloff; Jean Abitbol; Gary Shaw; Sanford Archer; Andrew McWhorter
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Voice outcomes after endoscopic injection laryngoplasty with hyaluronic acid stabilized gel.

Authors:  Phillip C Song; C Kwang Sung; Ramon A Franco
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Short-term results of laryngeal framework surgery--thyroplasty type 1: A pilot study.

Authors:  M L Harries; M Morrison
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1995-10

9.  Defining phonosurgery: a proposal for classification and nomenclature by the Phonosurgery Committee of the European Laryngological Society (ELS).

Authors:  Gerhard Friedrich; Marc Remacle; Martin Birchall; Jean Paul Marie; Christoph Arens
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 3.236

10.  Relevance of subglottic pressure in normal and dysphonic subjects.

Authors:  K Ketelslagers; M S De Bodt; F L Wuyts; P Van de Heyning
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 3.236

View more
  4 in total

1.  Learning curve of medialization thyroplasty using a Montgomery™ implant.

Authors:  G Desuter; S Henrard; D Boucquey; M Van Boven; Q Gardiner; M Remacle
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Using peak direct subglottic pressure level as an objective measure during medialization thyroplasty: a prospective study.

Authors:  Moahmmed I Almohizea; Vyas M N Prasad; Raja Fakhoury; Benoit Bihin; Marc Remacle
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Voice outcome indicators for unilateral vocal fold paralysis surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  G Desuter; M Dedry; B Schaar; J van Lith-Bijl; P P van Benthem; E V Sjögren
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  A synthetic, self-oscillating vocal fold model platform for studying augmentation injection.

Authors:  Preston R Murray; Scott L Thomson; Marshall E Smith
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 2.009

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.