Literature DB >> 21658222

Impact of UGT2B7 His268Tyr polymorphism on the outcome of adjuvant epirubicin treatment in breast cancer.

Sumit Parmar1, Julia Carolin Stingl, Ariana Huber-Wechselberger, Alexander Kainz, Wilfried Renner, Uwe Langsenlehner, Peter Krippl, Jürgen Brockmöller, Elisabeth Haschke-Becher.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Epirubicin is a common adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. It is mainly eliminated after glucuronidation through uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 (UGT2B7). The present study aimed to describe the impact of the UGT2B7(His268Tyr) polymorphism on invasive disease-free survival in breast cancer patients after epirubicin treatment.
METHODS: This is a pharmacogenetic study based on samples collected from 745 breast cancer patients of the Austrian Tumor of breast tissue: Incidence, Genetics, and Environmental Risk factors (TIGER) cohort who did not present metastases at baseline. This cohort included 205 women with epirubicin-based combination chemotherapy, 113 patients having received chemotherapy without epirubicin and 427 patients having received no chemotherapy at all. Of the epirubicin-treated subgroup, 120 were subsequently treated with tamoxifen. For all women UGT2B7(His268Tyr) was genotyped. Invasive disease-free survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox's proportional hazard regression analysis.
RESULTS: Among the 205 epirubicin-treated patients, carriers of two UGT2B7(268Tyr) alleles had a mean invasive disease-free survival of 8.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.9 to 9.3) years as compared to 7.5 (95% CI 6.9 to 8.0) years in carriers of at least one UGT2B7(268His) allele (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 2.64 (95% CI 1.22 to 5.71); P = 0.014). In addition, the impact of the UGT2B7(His268Tyr) polymorphism became even more pronounced in patients subsequently treated with tamoxifen (adjusted HR = 5.22 (95% CI 1.67 to 26.04); P = 0.015) whereas no such difference in invasive disease-free survival was observed in patients not receiving epirubicin.
CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer patients carrying the UGT2B7(268Tyr/Tyr) genotype may benefit most from adjuvant epirubicin-based chemotherapy. These results warrant confirmation in further studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21658222      PMCID: PMC3218946          DOI: 10.1186/bcr2894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res        ISSN: 1465-5411            Impact factor:   6.466


Introduction

Anthracyclines are commonly used for neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy of locally advanced breast cancer [1,2]. They act by inhibition of topoisomerase II alpha and generation of reactive oxygen species eventually resulting in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis [3,4]. Epirubicin is a semisynthetic derivative of doxorubicin preferentially used in breast cancer treatment. It is extensively metabolized in the liver to epirubicinol by aldo-keto reductase and in addition aglycones of epirubicin and epirubicinol are formed [5]. The major inactivation pathway for epirubicin and epirubicinol is glucuronidation catalysed by UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT). Studies using human liver microsomes, expressing UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, UGT2B7 and UGT2B15 revealed that UGT2B7 uniquely converts epirubicin to its glucuronide [6]. In addition, also the active metabolites of tamoxifen are eliminated by UGT2B7 mediated glucuronidation [7]. The UGT2B7 gene is polymorphic with a frequent non-synonymous variant 802 C > T leading to a histidine to tyrosine substitution in codon 268 (His268Tyr). The functional impact of this polymorphism is unclear as studies have shown lower [8-12], similar [13-15], and even higher enzyme activity of the UGT2B7268Tyr isoform [16-18]. Two in vitro studies showed no impact of the UGT2B7genotype on the epirubicin glucuronide formation [6,19]. However, the presently available in vitro studies cannot finally clarify, if variants linked with the UGT2B7polymorphism may modulate up- or downregulation of the enzyme under the conditions of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy and in vitro models can, of course, never fully resemble the in vivo conditions [19-22]. UGT2B7 haplotype analysis revealed six promoter variants (-1306 G > A, -1299C > T, -1112C > T, -900A > G, -327G > A and -161C > T) which modulate UGT2B7 promoter activity and are in perfect linkage disequilibrium with the UGT2B7variant [19,20,22,23]. In contrast, for 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen and endoxifen, the active metabolites of tamoxifen, a decreased glucuronidation activity was shown for the UGT2B7268Tyr isoform in vitro [9]. Here we present a pharmacogenetic (PGt) analysis of the Austrian Tumor of breast tissue: Incidence, Genetics, and Environmental Risk factors (TIGER) study [24,25] to explore the effect of the UGT2B7polymorphism on invasive disease-free survival after epirubicin treatment.

Materials and methods

Study design

The TIGER study was a cohort study to investigate genetic and environmental risk factors relevant to the onset and course of breast cancer [24,25]. As described earlier [26], the complete cohort consisted of 804 consecutive women with histologically confirmed breast cancer and no other cancer diagnosis, treated at the Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Graz, Austria between January 2000 and September 2004. For the purpose of this PGt study, patients presenting with metastases already at baseline (stage IV) or not having biomaterial available for PGt analyses were excluded. At stage IV host genetic polymorphisms were considered much less relevant for survival and sample size in this subgroup was too small (n = 38) to allow adjustment or stratified analysis for this stage of disease. Patients were regularly followed-up with clinical examinations, laboratory (including CEA and CA15-3), radiological (bone scan, liver scan, chest X-ray, and mammograms), and gynecological analyses at three-year intervals until 2010 [24]. The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was performed according to the Austrian Gene Technology Act. The protocol has been approved by the Ethical Committee of the Medical University Graz. Written informed consent was obtained from all participating subjects.

UGT2B7 genotyping

DNA was isolated from venous blood (Qiamp DNA Mini-Kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Genotyping for UGT2B7 802 C > T was performed blinded to the clinical outcomes using the validated TaqMan® SNP Genotyping Assay (C__32449742_20, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Real-time PCR reactions were set up in a final volume of 12.5 μl containing TaqMan® Genotyping Master Mix, 20 × SNP Genotyping Assay (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) distilled water and 3 to 20 ng genomic DNA. PCR amplification was carried out using the Real Time PCR System 7300 (Applied Biosystems) under the following conditions: 10 minutes 95°C enzyme activation followed by 40 cycles at 92°C for 15 s and at 60°C for 1 minute.

Statistical analysis

Invasive disease-free survival was defined as the time from diagnosis to any local, regional, or distant recurrence, metastases or contralateral breast cancer or death from any cause, but excluded second primary invasive cancer to consider only events which may reflect efficacy of initial epirubicin drug treatment [27]. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated and the log-rank test was used to compare invasive disease-free survival of different UGT2B7variant carriers after (1) adjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin, (2) adjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin and tamoxifen, (3) adjuvant chemotherapy other than epirubicin, or (4) no adjuvant chemotherapy at all. In the latter two subgroups no difference was expected and thus served as controls. Cox's proportional hazard modeling was used for subsequent multivariate analyses with adjustments for clinical prognostic factors such as tumor size, age at diagnosis, nodal status, and histological grade. Proportional hazards were assessed by Schoenfeld residuals as well as by including the interaction terms of covariates with time into the model. Possible differences in patient characteristics between the respective treatment and genotype groups were assessed using Chi-square test, Kruskal-Wallis test or Mann-Whitney test. All tests were two-sided, performed at a significance level of 0.05 using SPSS 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

Results

Study population

Of the original 804 patients of the TIGER cohort, 59 patients were excluded from this analysis due to metastases already at baseline, the lack of material for PGt analyses, or the revision of the breast cancer diagnosis during follow-up (Figure 1). Of the remaining 745 patients, 205 received epirubicin-based combination chemotherapy, 113 combination chemotherapy without epirubicin (mostly cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil), and 427 no adjuvant chemotherapy at all. Of the 205 epirubicin-treated patients, 120 subsequently also received tamoxifen (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Patient flow chart based on the original TIGER cohort. AI, aromatase inhibitor, TIGER, Austrian tumor of breast tissue: incidence, genetics, and environmental risk factors study.

Patient flow chart based on the original TIGER cohort. AI, aromatase inhibitor, TIGER, Austrian tumor of breast tissue: incidence, genetics, and environmental risk factors study.

Invasive disease-free survival by treatment

Patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy significantly differed from the remaining patients in clinical prognostic factors such as age, tumor size, grade, and nodal status (Table 1). Mean invasive disease-free survival times differed accordingly, with 7.9 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.4 to 8.3) in epirubicin-treated patients, 6.9 years (95% CI 6.1 to 7.6) in patients with adjuvant therapy other than epirubicin, and 9.1 years (95% CI 8.8 to 9.4) in the remaining patients. Corresponding rates of patients with disease progression during a mean follow-up period of 6.6 ± 2.0 years were 27.8%, 46.9%, and 18.3%, respectively.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics by treatment

Adjuvant chemotherapyEpirubicinNo epirubicinNone P*
Total patients No. (%)205 (27.5%)113 (15.2%)427 (57.3%)
Age in years (mean, SD)53.0 (10.5)55.6 (12.6)60.5 (12.0)< 0.001
Tumor size< 0.001
 ≤ T1 (≤ 20 mm)75 (36.6%)59 (52.2%)296 (69.3%)
 ≥ T2127 (62.0%)50 (44.2%)121 (28.3%)
 unknown3 (1.5%)4 (3.5%)10 (2.3%)
Lymph nodes< 0.001
 032 (15.6%)45 (39.8%)262 (61.4%)
 ≥ 1162 (79.0%)57 (50.4%)131 (30.7%)
 unknown11 (5.4%)11 (9.7%)34 (8.0%)
Grade< 0.001
 13 (1.5%)4 (3.5%)45 (10.5%)
 263 (30.7%)31 (27.4%)260 (60.9%)
 > 2128 (62.4%)77 (68.1%)107 (25.1%)
 Unknown11 (5.4%)1 (0.9%)15 (3.5%)

* P-values are indicated for the comparison of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (with or without epirubicin) vs. patients not treated with any adjuvant chemotherapy.

SD, standard deviation

Baseline characteristics by treatment * P-values are indicated for the comparison of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (with or without epirubicin) vs. patients not treated with any adjuvant chemotherapy. SD, standard deviation

Invasive disease-free survival by UGT2B7 genotype

In the entire cohort, 147 (19.7%) patients carried two histidine alleles, 352 (47.2%) were heterozygous and 246 (33.0%) carried two tyrosine-alleles. UGT2B7allele frequency was 57% and genotype frequencies matched Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (Chi square test, P = 0.27). Neither did frequencies of genotypes vary significantly among the three different treatment groups (Chi-square, P = 0.93) nor did epirubicin-treated carriers of different variants differ in tumor size, grade, and nodal status at baseline (Table 2). However, carriers of at least one UGT2B7allele were slightly older than non-carriers at baseline (54.4 ± 10.2 versus 50.1 ± 10.7; Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.01).
Table 2

Characteristics of epirubicin-treated patients by UGT2B7genotype

UGT2B7268 GenotypeTyr/TyrHis/Tyr + His/His P
Number (%)66 (32.2%)139 (67.8%)
Age in years (mean, SD)50.1 (10.7)54.4 (10.2)0.01
Tumor size0.12
 ≤ T1 (≤ 20 mm)29 (43.9%)46 (33.1%)
 ≥ T235 (53.0%)92 (66.2%)
 unknown2 (3.0%)1 (0.7%)
Lymph nodes0.73
 012 (18.2%)20 (14.4%)
 ≥ 150 (75.8%)112 (80.6%)
 unknown4 (6.1%)7 (5.0%)
Grade0.62
 11 (1.5%)2 (1.4%)
 217 (25.8%)46 (33.1%)
 > 243 (65.2%)85 (61.2%)
 Unknown5 (7.6%)6 (4.3%)

SD, standard deviation

Characteristics of epirubicin-treated patients by UGT2B7genotype SD, standard deviation In epirubicin-treated patients an association between the UGT2B7polymorphism and invasive disease-free survival was observed (log-rank P = 0.05). By comparing carriers and non-carriers of the UGT2B7allele a significantly increased relapse risk was observed for the carriers of the UGT2B7allele (Figure 2a; log-rank P = 0.017). The incidences of relapses and other events constituting a disease progression were 33.1% and 15.2% in carriers and non-carriers of the UGT2B7allele, respectively. Accordingly, carriers of at least one UGT2B7allele had a shorter mean invasive disease-free survival time of 7.5 years (95% CI 6.9 to 8.0) as compared to 8.6 years (95% CI 7.9 to 9.3) in UGT2B7carriers (Figure 2a, Table 3). The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for carriers of at least one UGT2B7allele was 2.24 (95% CI 1.13 to 4.44; P = 0.021). Cox's regression models with adjustment for age at diagnosis, nodal status and tumor grade, stratified by tumor size due to non proportional hazard, resulted in an only slightly deviating adjusted HR of 2.64 (95% CI 1.22 to 5.71; P = 0.014).
Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier plots of invasive disease-free survival depending on the . (b) epirubicin-treated patients subsequently treated with tamoxifen.

Table 3

Invasive disease-free survival according to UGT2B7genotype and treatment

Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Adjuvant chemotherapyCrudeAdjusted
Epirubicin2.24 (1.13 to 4.44)2.64 (1.22 to 5.71)
P = 0.021P = 0.014
Epirubicin/tamoxifen4.43 (1.34 to 14.6)5.22 (1.67-26.04)
P = 0.015P = 0.015)
No epirubicin0.80 (0.43 to 1.49)0.78 (0.40 to 1.50)
P = 0.48P = 0.45
None0.80 (0.47 to 1.34)0.87 (0.49 to 1.55)
P = 0.39P = 0.64

CI, confidence interval.

Kaplan-Meier plots of invasive disease-free survival depending on the . (b) epirubicin-treated patients subsequently treated with tamoxifen. Invasive disease-free survival according to UGT2B7genotype and treatment CI, confidence interval. Interestingly, in the subgroup of patients subsequently treated with tamoxifen the effect of the UGT2B7allele to indicate a poor prognosis became even more pronounced (Figure 2b, Table 3) with an adjusted HR of 5.22 (95% CI 1.67 to 26.04; P = 0.015). However, in this model the Firth correction was applied as all patients with nodal status 0 were censored [28]. In the patient subgroup not receiving epirubicin, but tamoxifen in monotherapy (n = 305), there was no association of invasive disease-free survival with the UGT2B7genotype (log-rank P = 0.20), as well as in any other patient group not receiving epirubicin (Figure 3, Table 3).
Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier plots of invasive disease-free survival depending on the . (a) Patients receiving a combination chemotherapy not containing epirubicin or (b) no adjuvant chemotherapy at all.

Kaplan-Meier plots of invasive disease-free survival depending on the . (a) Patients receiving a combination chemotherapy not containing epirubicin or (b) no adjuvant chemotherapy at all.

Discussion

Genetic polymorphisms that might be relevant to drug metabolism and elimination have extensively been studied over the last years to explain between-subject variation in drug responses and to better target corresponding treatments [29-32]. Particularly in breast cancer, genetic polymorphisms of proteins involved in drug transport or metabolism have been shown to affect the efficacy of agents such as tamoxifen, taxanes or aromatase inhibitors [7,33,34]. A considerable variation in the response to epirubicin-based chemotherapies has been reported as well [35-37]. The formation of epirubicin glucuronide represent the main inactivating pathway for epirubicin and studies in human liver microsomes expressing a multitude of UGT isoenzymes, revealed that UGT2B7 uniquely converts epirubicin to its glucuronide [6]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study providing evidence that genetic UGT2B7 variation contributes to these clinical observations. In our analysis, epirubicin-treated women with the UGT2B7genotype showed a significantly better invasive disease-free survival as compared to carriers of at least one UGT2B7allele. As the use of epirubicin is quite common and the difference in the average invasive disease-free survival times between both variant carriers amounted to about one year, we think this finding might be of broad interest and high relevance in cancer therapy, although it still needs to be confirmed. A lower glucuronidation capacity of the UGT2B7268Tyr isoform may delay elimination and cause higher exposure to epirubicin and its active metabolites. This may eventually result in the observed longer invasive disease-free survival of carriers of the UGT2B7genotype. This is in line with biochemical studies revealing a decreased activity of the UGT2B7268Tyr isoforms assessing other UGT2B7 substrates [8-12]. However, those were contradicted by others [13-18] and by two in vitro studies showing no impact of the UGT2B7genotype on the epirubicin glucuronide formation [6,19]. One of these studies utilized two lines of HK293 cells expressing the two isoforms generated via site-directed mutagenesis [6]. This methodology implies the disadvantage that the variant leading to an amino acid exchange is solely studied, whereas potentially linked variants remain unconsidered [6,16]. This seems to be important, since the UGT2B7variant appears in frequent haplotypes with other variants, especially promoter variants (-1306 G > A, -1299C > T, -1112 C > T, -900 A > G, -327 G > A and -161 C > T) which seem to influence the expression of the two UGT2B7His268Tyr isoforms [13,19-22]. The variant alleles of those promoter variants were associated with a two-fold decreased promoter activity and are perfectly linked with the UGT2B7allele [22]. Djebli et al. genotyped the -900 A > G promoter variant beside UGT2B7and they reported that all individuals carrying the -900GG genotype carried also two variant UGT2B7alleles and those who were heterozygote for the promoter variant were as well heterozygote for UGT2B7[21]. Using the tagging algorithm implemented in Haploview and the genotype frequencies for the HapMap CEU samples we observed that UGT2B7and the linked promoter variants captured 83% of all genotyped markers (applying a r2 cut-off of 0.8, minor allele frequency > 0.05, and using NM_001074 +/- 10 kb) [38,39]. The UGT2B7variant is further linked to the rather rare promoter variant -138 G > A (less than 2% in Caucasians) which was associated with a seven-fold decreased promoter activity and it cannot be excluded if this variant contributes to our observations [22]. The presently available in vitro studies cannot finally clarify, if those promoter variants may modulate up- or downregulation of the enzyme, especially under the conditions of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, it remains unclear if our observations can be mainly attributed to the UGT2B7variant or to the expressional regulation caused by linked promoter variants. However, in human liver microsomes, genotyped for UGT2B7, no difference related to this polymorphism in epirubicin glucuronide formation was observed [19], but it is conceivable that there is an up- or downregulation of UGT2B7 caused by anti-cancer drug therapy which may differ inter-individually depending on genetic variants. Whether or not this does play a relevant role in epirubicin treatment cannot finally be clarified by our study but may be an interesting topic for further research. Sawyer et al. also observed differences in morphine glucuronidation studying the linked UGT2B7 -161 C > T variant in pain patients, but failed to confirm their finding in genotyped microsomes [18]. This may indicate differences between the in vitro and the in vivo impact of the variant or the associated UGT2B7 haplotypes. A few studies have investigated the impact of the UGT2B7variant on the in vivo metabolism of other drugs. For mycophenolic acid (MPA), a lower glucuronidation activity and MPA-acyl-glucuronide formation rate through the UGT2B7variant was shown [21,40], which resulted in fewer gastrointestinal side-effects among MPA treated patients [41]. However, in contrast to MPA-acyl-glucuronide [41,42], the glucuronide of epirubicin are not known to contribute considerably to the side effects of the parental drug. Moreover, changes in drug tolerability may affect efficacy outcomes only if those result in changes in treatment adherence. Actually, we have neither data on epirubicin dose modifications and premature discontinuations nor on the incidence of adverse drug reactions. Additionally, an association of the linked UGT2B7 -161 C > T variant with pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine in epileptic patients has been recently reported [43]. By contrast, no effect was observed either on pharmacokinetics of efavirenz or zidovudine in human immunodeficiency virus infected patients [44,45], or on the treatment response to various opioids [46-48]. Given that our study was a retrospective analysis, we unfortunately were not able to determine plasma levels of drug compounds or metabolites. A possible influencing factor might be the younger age among UGT2B7carriers in the epirubicin treated patients group, but although age is a relevant covariate for survival, the relatively small difference in mean age between the different UGT2B7 genotypes is very unlikely to explain a major part of the relatively strong UGT2B7 effects on survival after epirubicin treatment. In addition, we observed no difference in patient age comparing the UGT2B7 genotype groups within the other patient subgroups and no association between age at diagnosis and outcome in the multivariate analysis. Besides, a link to breast cancer risk has also been discussed for the UGT2B7polymorphism, but no clear evidence has been reported and it is very unlikely that this is a contributing factor to our observations [49,50]. In addition, the association of the UGT2B7variant with invasive disease-free survival was even more pronounced in the subgroup of epirubicin-treated women who subsequently received tamoxifen (Figure 2b). Actually, in vitro data suggested reduced glucuronidation rates of the active metabolites 4-hydroxy tamoxifen and endoxifen through the UGT2B7268Tyr isoform [9], but in contrast to epirubicin, sulfotransferases also play a quantitatively important role [51]. Accordingly, no difference in steady state plasma concentrations of tamoxifen metabolites was observed in 240 breast cancer patients receiving 20 mg tamoxifen daily [52]. In the present study, the sequential treatment with two UGT2B7 substrates resulted in a considerable effect of the UGT2B7variant, whereas there was no difference in invasive disease-free survival among patients not treated with epirubicin, including the subgroup of women treated with tamoxifen alone. The more pronounced effect of the UGT2B7polymorphism in patients treated with both epirubicin and tamoxifen remains currently unexplained and is limited by the rather small sample size of this patient subgroup.

Conclusions

Breast cancer patients carrying the UGT2B7genotype may benefit most from adjuvant epirubicin-based chemotherapy. Prospective studies with pharmacokinetic measurements and fixed treatment regimens are warranted.

Abbreviations

CA15-3: cancer antigen 15-3; CEA: carcinoembryonic antigen; CI: confidence interval; HK293: human kidney 293 cell line; HR: hazard ratio; MPA: mycophenolic acid; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; PGt: pharmacogenetic; SD: standard deviation; TIGER: Austrian tumor of breast tissue: incidence, genetics, and environmental risk factors study; UDP: uridine diphosphate; UGT: UDP-glucuronosyltransferase.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

JCS, WR and EHB conceived the idea for the present analysis and designed the study. WR provided the study material. SP, JCS, AHW, UL, WR, PK and EHB collected the data. SP, JCS, AK, JB, AHW, UL, WR, PK and EHB analyzed and interpreted the data. SP, JCS and EHB prepared the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript and gave their final approval.
  49 in total

1.  ABCB1 and cytochrome P450 genotypes and phenotypes: influence on methadone plasma levels and response to treatment.

Authors:  Séverine Crettol; Jean-Jacques Déglon; Jacques Besson; Marina Croquette-Krokar; Robert Hämmig; Isabelle Gothuey; Martine Monnat; Chin B Eap
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Pharmacogenetics of irinotecan: clinical perspectives on the utility of genotyping.

Authors:  Federico Innocenti; Mark J Ratain
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.533

3.  Impact of CYP2D6*4 genotype on progression free survival in tamoxifen breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Julia Carolin Stingl; Sumit Parmar; Ariana Huber-Wechselberger; Alexander Kainz; Wilfried Renner; Angela Seeringer; Jürgen Brockmöller; Uwe Langsenlehner; Peter Krippl; Elisabeth Haschke-Becher
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.580

Review 4.  Regulation of human dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase: implications in the pharmacogenetics of 5-FU-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Xue Zhang; Robert B Diasio
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.533

5.  Environmental and genetic factors associated with morphine response in the postoperative period.

Authors:  Laurent Coulbault; Marc Beaussier; Céline Verstuyft; Henri Weickmans; Liliane Dubert; David Trégouet; Christelle Descot; Yann Parc; André Lienhart; Patrice Jaillon; Laurent Becquemont
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  C-440T/T-331C polymorphisms in the UGT1A9 gene affect the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Sara Baldelli; Simona Merlini; Norberto Perico; Annalisa Nicastri; Monica Cortinovis; Eliana Gotti; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Dario Cattaneo
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.533

7.  Limited influence of UGT1A1*28 and no effect of UGT2B7*2 polymorphisms on UGT1A1 or UGT2B7 activities and protein expression in human liver microsomes.

Authors:  Vincent C Peterkin; Jonathan N Bauman; Theunis C Goosen; Lee Menning; Michael Z Man; Joseph D Paulauskis; J Andrew Williams; Scott P Myrand
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: the STEEP system.

Authors:  Clifford A Hudis; William E Barlow; Joseph P Costantino; Robert J Gray; Kathleen I Pritchard; Judith-Anne W Chapman; Joseph A Sparano; Sally Hunsberger; Rebecca A Enos; Richard D Gelber; Jo Anne Zujewski
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Influence of the UGT2B7 promoter region and exon 2 polymorphisms and comedications on Acyl-MPAG production in vitro and in adult renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Nassim Djebli; Nicolas Picard; Jean-Philippe Rérolle; Yann Le Meur; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Genetic polymorphisms in the vascular endothelial growth factor gene and breast cancer risk. The Austrian "tumor of breast tissue: incidence, genetics, and environmental risk factors" study.

Authors:  Uwe Langsenlehner; Gerald Wolf; Tanja Langsenlehner; Armin Gerger; Günter Hofmann; Heimo Clar; Thomas C Wascher; Bernhard Paulweber; Hellmut Samonigg; Peter Krippl; Wilfried Renner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative Proteomics in Translational Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion and Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Deepak Ahire; Laken Kruger; Sheena Sharma; Vijaya Saradhi Mettu; Abdul Basit; Bhagwat Prasad
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 18.923

2.  Pharmacogenetics of UGT1A4, UGT2B7 and UGT2B15 and Their Influence on Tamoxifen Disposition in Asian Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Natalia Sutiman; Joanne Siok Liu Lim; Thomas E Muerdter; Onkar Singh; Yin Bun Cheung; Raymond Chee Hui Ng; Yoon Sim Yap; Nan Soon Wong; Peter Cher Siang Ang; Rebecca Dent; Werner Schroth; Matthias Schwab; Chiea Chuen Khor; Balram Chowbay
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Pharmacogenomics of breast cancer therapy: an update.

Authors:  Kelly Westbrook; Vered Stearns
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 12.310

4.  Determination of major UDP-glucuronosyltransferase enzymes and their genotypes responsible for 20-HETE glucuronidation.

Authors:  Yazun Bashir Jarrar; Eun-Young Cha; Kyung-Ah Seo; Jong-Lyul Ghim; Hyo-Ji Kim; Dong-Hyun Kim; Su-Jun Lee; Jae-Gook Shin
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 5.922

5.  Actionable pharmacogenetic markers for prediction and prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Keith Sacco; Godfrey Grech
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 6.543

6.  Comprehensive variant screening of the UGT gene family.

Authors:  Jason Yongha Kim; Hyun Sub Cheong; Byung Lae Park; Lyoung Hyo Kim; Suhg Namgoong; Ji On Kim; Hae Deun Kim; Young Hoon Kim; Myeon Woo Chung; Soon Young Han; Hyoung Doo Shin
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Association of UGT2B7 polymorphisms with risk of induced liver injury by anti-tuberculosis drugs in Chinese Han.

Authors:  Guo Chen; Shou-Quan Wu; Mei Feng; Yu Wang; Jing-Can Wu; Gui-Yi Ji; Miao-Miao Zhang; Qian-Qian Liu; Jian-Qing He
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.219

8.  Pharmacogenetic study in gastric cancer patients treated with adjuvant fluorouracil/leucovorin or epirubicin/cisplatin/fluorouracil before and after chemoradiation on CALGB 80101 (Alliance).

Authors:  Jai N Patel; Chen Jiang; Kouros Owzar; Flora Mulkey; Jasmine A Luzum; Harvey J Mamon; Daniel G Haller; Tomislav Dragovich; Steven R Alberts; Georg Bjarnason; Christopher G Willet; Donna Niedzwiecki; Peter Enzinger; Mark J Ratain; Charles Fuchs; Howard L McLeod
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Functional polymorphisms in xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes and their impact on the therapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  Rosane Vianna-Jorge; Juliana Simões Festa-Vasconcellos; Sheyla Maria Torres Goulart-Citrangulo; Marcelo Sobral Leite
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Effects of CYP3A5 and UGT2B7 variants on steady-state carbamazepine concentrations in Chinese epileptic patients.

Authors:  Qiong Lu; Yuan-Tao Huang; Yi Shu; Ping Xu; Da-Xiong Xiang; Qiang Qu; Jian Qu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.