OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospital volume is associated with clinical and economic outcomes for patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent pancreatic resection, palliative bypass, or endoscopic or percutaneous stent procedures in Maryland between 1990 and 1995. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have demonstrated that outcomes for patients undergoing a Whipple procedure improve with higher surgical volume, but only 20% to 35% of patients with pancreatic cancer qualify for curative resection. Most patients undergo palliative procedures instead with a surgical bypass or biliary stent. METHODS: Analysis of hospital discharge data from all nonfederal acute care hospitals in Maryland identified all patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent a pancreatic resection, palliative bypass, or stent procedure between 1990 and 1995. Hospitals (n = 48) were categorized as high-, medium-, and low-volume providers according to their average annual volume of these procedures. Multivariate regression was used to examine the association between hospital volume and in-hospital mortality rate, length of stay, and hospital charges, after adjusting for differences in case mix and surgeon volume. RESULTS: Increased hospital volume is associated with markedly decreased in-hospital mortality rates and a decreased or similar length of stay for all three types of procedures and with decreased or similar hospital charges for resections and stents. After adjustment for case mix differences, the relative risk (RR) of in-hospital death after pancreatic resection was 19.3 and 8 at the low- and medium-volume hospitals, respectively, versus the high-volume hospital; after bypasses, the RR of death was 2.7 and 1.9, respectively; and after stents, the RR was 4.3 and 4.8, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pancreatic cancer who are to be treated with curative or palliative procedures appear to benefit from referral to a high-volume provider.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospital volume is associated with clinical and economic outcomes for patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent pancreatic resection, palliative bypass, or endoscopic or percutaneous stent procedures in Maryland between 1990 and 1995. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have demonstrated that outcomes for patients undergoing a Whipple procedure improve with higher surgical volume, but only 20% to 35% of patients with pancreatic cancer qualify for curative resection. Most patients undergo palliative procedures instead with a surgical bypass or biliary stent. METHODS: Analysis of hospital discharge data from all nonfederal acute care hospitals in Maryland identified all patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent a pancreatic resection, palliative bypass, or stent procedure between 1990 and 1995. Hospitals (n = 48) were categorized as high-, medium-, and low-volume providers according to their average annual volume of these procedures. Multivariate regression was used to examine the association between hospital volume and in-hospital mortality rate, length of stay, and hospital charges, after adjusting for differences in case mix and surgeon volume. RESULTS: Increased hospital volume is associated with markedly decreased in-hospital mortality rates and a decreased or similar length of stay for all three types of procedures and with decreased or similar hospital charges for resections and stents. After adjustment for case mix differences, the relative risk (RR) of in-hospital death after pancreatic resection was 19.3 and 8 at the low- and medium-volume hospitals, respectively, versus the high-volume hospital; after bypasses, the RR of death was 2.7 and 1.9, respectively; and after stents, the RR was 4.3 and 4.8, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with pancreatic cancer who are to be treated with curative or palliative procedures appear to benefit from referral to a high-volume provider.
Authors: C J Yeo; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt; M A Talamini; R H Hruban; S E Ord; P K Sauter; J Coleman; M L Zahurak; L B Grochow; R A Abrams Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; K Hur; M Hossain; D Soybel; K W Kizer; J B Aust; R H Bell; V Chong; J Demakis; P J Fabri; J O Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; G McDonald; E Passaro; L Phillips; F Scamman; J Spencer; J F Stremple Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Albert Amini; John T Miura; Thejus T Jayakrishnan; Fabian M Johnston; Susan Tsai; Kathleen K Christians; T Clark Gamblin; Kiran K Turaga Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Elijah Dixon; Oliver F Bathe; Andrew McKay; Isabelle You; Scot Dowden; David Sadler; Kelly W Burak; J Gregory McKinnon; Walter Miller; Francis R Sutherland Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Paul D Colavita; Victor B Tsirline; Igor Belyansky; Ryan Z Swan; Amanda L Walters; Amy E Lincourt; David A Iannitti; B Todd Heniford Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 3.452