Literature DB >> 19234646

Population-based review of the outcomes following hepatic resection in a Canadian health region.

Elijah Dixon1, Oliver F Bathe, Andrew McKay, Isabelle You, Scot Dowden, David Sadler, Kelly W Burak, J Gregory McKinnon, Walter Miller, Francis R Sutherland.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Higher hospital and surgeon volumes have been associated with improved outcomes following hepatic resection; however, there appear to be additional factors that also play a role. The objective of our study was to examine the outcomes following hepatic resection over the past 13 years in a large urban Canadian health region.
METHODS: We used administrative procedure codes to identify all patients from 1991/92 to 2003/04 who underwent a hepatic resection in the Calgary health region, which has a referral base of about 1.5 million people. The primary outcome was operative mortality, defined as death before discharge.
RESULTS: There were 424 hepatic resections performed in the stated time period. Annual volume was stable until 2000, when it increased substantially. This corresponded to the formation of a multidisciplinary group that provided care to these patients. There were 25 deaths over the study period for a mean mortality of 5.9%. The mean length of stay in hospital was 14.6 (median 10) days. Over time, however, mortality steadily decreased. This corresponded to a concomitant increase in the volume of hepatic resections performed.
CONCLUSION: Over the past 13 years, the number of hepatic resections performed has increased; there has been a corresponding improvement in mortality rates. The improved rates are likely the result of multiple factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19234646      PMCID: PMC2637646     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  37 in total

1.  Society of University Surgeons position statement on the volume-outcome relationship for surgical procedures.

Authors:  David H Berger; Clifford Y Ko; David A Spain
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  National trends in the use and outcomes of hepatic resection.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Reid M Wainess; John A Cowan; Gilbert R Upchurch; James A Knol; Lisa M Colletti
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  AHPBA/SSO/SSAT Consensus Conference on hepatic colorectal metastases: rationale and overview of the conference. January 25, 2006.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Michael A Choti; W Scott Helton
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Patient outcomes for segmental colon resection according to surgeon's training, certification, and experience.

Authors:  Jay B Prystowsky; Georges Bordage; Joseph M Feinglass
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative.

Authors:  J D Birkmeyer; E V Finlayson; C M Birkmeyer
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Effects of hospital volume on life expectancy after selected cancer operations in older adults: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Emily V A Finlayson; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Hepatic resection in the United States: indications, outcomes, and hospital procedural volumes from a nationally representative database.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; John A Cowan; James A Knol; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-02

8.  Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study.

Authors:  Emily V A Finlayson; Philip P Goodney; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-07

9.  Does it matter what a hospital is "high volume" for? Specificity of hospital volume-outcome associations for surgical procedures: analysis of administrative data.

Authors:  D R Urbach; N N Baxter
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

10.  Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade.

Authors:  William R Jarnagin; Mithat Gonen; Yuman Fong; Ronald P DeMatteo; Leah Ben-Porat; Sarah Little; Carlos Corvera; Sharon Weber; Leslie H Blumgart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The volume effect in liver surgery--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arthur J Richardson; Tony C Y Pang; Emma Johnston; Michael J Hollands; Vincent W T Lam; Henry C C Pleass
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Surgical process improvement tools: defining quality gaps and priority areas in gastrointestinal cancer surgery.

Authors:  A C Wei; K S Devitt; M Wiebe; O F Bathe; R S McLeod; D R Urbach
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Should esophageal resections for cancer be performed in high-volume centers only?

Authors:  Carlo V Feo; Victoria M Villaflor; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2011-06-22

4.  Hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery workforce in Canada.

Authors:  Janet P Edwards; Alexsander Bressan; Navjit Dharampal; Sean C Grondin; Indraneel Datta; Elijah Dixon; Sean P Cleary; Jeffrey S Barkun; Jean M Butte; Chad G Ball
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 5.  An evidence-based multidisciplinary approach to the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): the Alberta HCC algorithm.

Authors:  Kelly W Burak; Norman M Kneteman
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 6.  Improving quality through process change: a scoping review of process improvement tools in cancer surgery.

Authors:  Alice C Wei; David R Urbach; Katharine S Devitt; Meagan Wiebe; Oliver F Bathe; Robin S McLeod; Erin D Kennedy; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.