Literature DB >> 9737476

Low-molecular-weight heparins in non-ST-segment elevation ischemia: the ESSENCE trial. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, in non-Q-wave Coronary Events.

M Cohen1, C Demers, E P Gurfinkel, A G Turpie, G J Fromell, S Goodman, A Langer, R M Califf, K A Fox, J Premmereur, F Bigonzi.   

Abstract

Combination antithrombotic therapy with heparin plus aspirin decreases the risk of recurrent ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. Compared with standard unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has a more predictable antithrombotic effect, is easier to administer, and does not require coagulation monitoring. At 176 hospitals in 3 continents, 3,171 patients with rest unstable angina or non-wave myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to either enoxaparin (a LMWH), 1 mg/kg twice daily subcutaneously, or to continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin, for a minimum of 48 hours to a maximum of 8 days. Trial medication was administered in a double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion. At 14 days, the primary endpoint, the composite risk of death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent angina with electrocardiographic changes or prompting intervention, was significantly lower in patients assigned to enoxaparin compared with heparin (16.6% vs 19.8%; odds ratio [OR] 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.49; p = 0.019). At 30 days, the composite risk of death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent angina remained significantly lower in the enoxaparin group compared with the unfractionated heparin group (19.8% vs 23.3%, OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.0-1.46, p = 0.016). The rate of revascularization procedures at 30 days was also significantly lower in patients assigned to enoxaparin (27.1% vs 32.2%, p = 0.001). The 30-day incidence of major bleeding complication was 6.5% versus 7.0% (p = not significant), but the incidence of minor bleeding was significantly higher in the enoxaparin group (13.8% vs 8.8%, p <0.001) due primarily to injection-site ecchymosis. Thus, combination antithrombotic therapy with enoxaparin plus aspirin is more effective than unfractionated heparin plus aspirin in decreasing ischemic outcomes in patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction in the early (30 days) phase. The lower recurrent ischemic event rate seen with the LMWH, enoxaparin, is achieved without an increase in major bleeding, but with an increase in minor bleeding complications due mainly to injection-site ecchymosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9737476     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00108-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  17 in total

Review 1.  Which antithrombin for whom? Identifying the patient population that benefits most from novel antithrombin agents.

Authors:  David A Burke; Haider J Warraich; Duane S Pinto
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Multi-vessel coronary disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  C Casey; David P Faxon
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Anti-factor Xa kinetics after intravenous enoxaparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a population model analysis.

Authors:  Paola Sanchez-Pena; Jean-Sébastien Hulot; Saïk Urien; Annick Ankri; Jean-Philippe Collet; Rémi Choussat; Philippe Lechat; Gilles Montalescot
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Use of enoxaparin in patients with chronic kidney disease: safety considerations.

Authors:  Donald F Brophy; Domenic A Sica
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Use of multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of acute chest pain: a consensus statement of the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology.

Authors:  Arthur E Stillman; Matthijs Oudkerk; Margaret Ackerman; Christoph R Becker; Pawel E Buszman; Pim J de Feyter; Udo Hoffmann; Matthew T Keadey; Riccardo Marano; Martin J Lipton; Gilbert L Raff; Gautham P Reddy; Michael R Rees; Geoffrey D Rubin; U Joseph Schoepf; Giuseppe Tarulli; Edwin J R van Beek; Lewis Wexler; Charles S White
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Catheter thrombosis during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction despite subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin, acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel and abciximab pretreatment.

Authors:  Christopher E Buller; Gordon E Pate; Paul W Armstrong; Blair J O'Neill; John G Webb; Richard Gallo; Robert C Welsh
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 7.  Formulary management of low molecular weight heparins.

Authors:  W E Wade; B C Martin; J A Kotzan; W J Spruill; M A Chisoholm; M Perri
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Guidelines for the acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  E Rapaport
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  The impact of bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes: how to optimize the benefits of treatment and minimize the risk.

Authors:  David Fitchett
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 10.  The role of pharmacotherapy and catheter-based intervention in the management of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  William E Boden
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.