Literature DB >> 12052265

The role of pharmacotherapy and catheter-based intervention in the management of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

William E Boden1.   

Abstract

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines has published recommendations regarding diagnosis and treatment of patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The acute ischemia pathway presented in these guidelines encompasses both an early invasive strategy and an early conservative strategy. The recognition of the role of platelet biology in ACS led to the development of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists for the management of patients with NSTE ACS. Based on studies of risk stratification models for NSTE ACS, as well as a better understanding of the underlying biology of serum markers of myocardial necrosis, refinements have been made in identifying which patients benefit most from intravenous platelet receptor antagonism and the use of early invasive strategies. The available data suggest that for the NSTE ACS patient with intermediate- to high-risk features, the early initiation of intravenous platelet receptor antagonism with a small molecule GP IIb/IIIa receptor blocker, followed by timely cardiac catheterization with attempts at revascularization is the superior management strategy. In the majority of cases where such patients present to a facility without cardiac catheterization capability, stabilization with antiplatelet, antithrombotic, and anti-ischemic therapies should be undertaken prior to timely tertiary percutaneous coronary intervention referral.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12052265     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-002-0061-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  45 in total

1.  Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-06-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban.

Authors:  C P Cannon; W S Weintraub; L A Demopoulos; R Vicari; M J Frey; N Lakkis; F J Neumann; D H Robertson; P T DeLucca; P M DiBattiste; C M Gibson; E Braunwald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-06-21       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Management of patients with acute coronary syndromes in the United States by platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition. Insights from the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in unstable angina: receptor suppression using integrilin therapy (PURSUIT) trial.

Authors:  A M Lincoff; R A Harrington; R M Califf; J S Hochman; A D Guerci; E M Ohman; C J Pepine; S L Kopecky; N S Kleiman; C M Pacchiana; L G Berdan; M M Kitt; M L Simoons; E J Topol
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-09-05       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary-artery disease: the FRISC II invasive randomised trial. FRISC II Investigators. Fast Revascularisation during Instability in Coronary artery disease.

Authors:  L Wallentin; B Lagerqvist; S Husted; F Kontny; E Ståhle; E Swahn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Long-term low-molecular-mass heparin in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study. FRagmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease. Investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-08-28       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Benefits and safety of tirofiban among acute coronary syndrome patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency: results from the Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management in Patients Limited by Unstable Signs and Symptoms (PRISM-PLUS) trial.

Authors:  James L Januzzi; Steven M Snapinn; Peter M DiBattiste; Ik-Kyung Jang; Pierre Theroux
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-05-21       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Use of risk stratification to identify patients with unstable angina likeliest to benefit from an invasive versus conservative management strategy.

Authors:  D H Solomon; P H Stone; R J Glynn; D A Ganz; C M Gibson; R Tracy; J Avorn
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Assessment of the treatment effect of enoxaparin for unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. TIMI 11B-ESSENCE meta-analysis.

Authors:  E M Antman; M Cohen; D Radley; C McCabe; J Rush; J Premmereur; E Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-10-12       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  TIMI 11B. Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial. Rationale, study design, and methods. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11B Trial Investigators.

Authors:  E M Antman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Effects of tissue plasminogen activator and a comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results of the TIMI IIIB Trial. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.