Literature DB >> 10747761

Formulary management of low molecular weight heparins.

W E Wade1, B C Martin, J A Kotzan, W J Spruill, M A Chisoholm, M Perri.   

Abstract

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are increasingly being utilised as anticoagulants in healthcare settings. These agents offer several advantages over standard unfractionated heparin. Indications for LMWHs include deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism prophylaxis, deep vein thrombosis treatment, use in coronary procedures associated with a high risk for bleeding, and in acute coronary syndromes. Prior to being added to formularies, LMWHs should be evaluated for efficacy, safety and economic benefits over other anticoagulants. Institutions should be prepared to conduct their own economic assessments in the absence of readily available studies. There is clear evidence that LMWHs are cost saving or are at least cost effective as thromboprophylactic agents in major orthopaedic surgery. The economic benefits of LMWHs in other surgical situations is less clear. Consistent evidence from several countries indicate that LMWHs are cost saving as anticoagulants for the initial treatment of DVT. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and economics of LMWHs in other conditions besides hip and knee arthroplasty and general surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10747761     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200017010-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  133 in total

1.  Methodological and conduct principles for pharmacoeconomic research. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.

Authors:  K Clemens; R Townsend; F Luscombe; J Mauskopf; J Osterhaus; J Bobula
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Cost analysis of ardeparin versus enoxaparin for the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis after knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  W E Wade
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 3.  Cost-effectiveness of venous thrombosis prophylaxis after ischemic stroke.

Authors:  W E Wade
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.159

4.  Cost analysis of the American College of Chest Physicians guidelines for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in patients undergoing orthopedic arthroplastic surgery.

Authors:  W E Wade; W J Spruill
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.705

5.  Prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis with a low-molecular-weight heparin (Kabi 2165/Fragmin) in stroke patients.

Authors:  M H Prins; R Gelsema; A K Sing; L R van Heerde; G J den Ottolander
Journal:  Haemostasis       Date:  1989

6.  Efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin (CY216) in preventing postoperative venous thrombo-embolism: a co-operative study.

Authors:  V V Kakkar; W J Murray
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Prevention of deep-vein thrombosis following total hip replacement surgery with enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation.

Authors:  J Menzin; R Richner; D Huse; G A Colditz; G Oster
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Prophylaxis of venographically diagnosed deep vein thrombosis in gastrointestinal surgery. Multicentre trials 20 mg and 40 mg enoxaparin versus dextran.

Authors:  J N Wiig; J H Solhaug; T Bilberg; T Bjerkeset; B Edwin; O P Grüner; O Havig; O Holter; G Knudsen; R Lundblad
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1995-09

9.  Economic evaluation of standard heparin and enoxaparin for prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis in elective hip surgery.

Authors:  M Drummond; M Aristides; L Davies; C Forbes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  When innovative therapies make economic sense: economic analysis of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in the ESSENCE trial--an overview. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous in non-Q Wave Coronary Events.

Authors:  D Mark
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.223

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Max Brosa; Carlos Rubio-Terrés; Ibrahim Farr; Vijay Nadipelli; Jenaro Froufe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Tinzaparin sodium: a review of its pharmacology and clinical use in the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  Susan M Cheer; Christopher J Dunn; Rachel Foster
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.