Literature DB >> 9736469

Magnetic stimulation of visual cortex: factors influencing the perception of phosphenes.

P G Ray1, K J Meador, C M Epstein, D W Loring, L J Day.   

Abstract

Using transcranial magnetic stimulation of occipital cortex, the authors studied the stimulus parameters that generate phosphenes in healthy volunteers. Single pulses or trains of stimuli readily elicited phosphenes in all subjects. The threshold current needed to elicit perception of phosphenes was essentially the same for stimulus trains from 250 msec to 2000 msec in length, but increased dramatically for trains of shorter duration. The effect of stimulus frequency was variable, with each subject having a distinctive "frequency tuning curve," but overall, the threshold current necessary to produce phosphenes decreased as frequency of stimulation increased. Using paired pulses, the perceptual threshold was flat for interstimulus intervals between 2 msec and 100 msec, but increased rapidly as the interstimulus interval was increased above 100 msec. Stimulation of sites lateral to the midline elicited phosphenes in the contralateral visual field. Phosphenes were dominant in the lower and peripheral aspects of the visual fields. The findings are discussed in relation to similar studies of electrical stimulation of somatosensory cortex.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9736469     DOI: 10.1097/00004691-199807000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  14 in total

1.  Phosphene threshold as a function of contrast of external visual stimuli.

Authors:  Andreas M Rauschecker; Sven Bestmann; Vincent Walsh; Kai V Thilo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Dissecting neural circuits for multisensory integration and crossmodal processing.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol applied to visual cortex of anaesthetized cat: effects on visually evoked single-unit activity.

Authors:  Vera Moliadze; Dimitrios Giannikopoulos; Ulf T Eysel; Klaus Funke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Interhemispheric transfer of phosphenes generated by occipital versus parietal transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Carlo A Marzi; Francesca Mancini; Silvia Savazzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Is selective primary visual cortex stimulation achievable with TMS?

Authors:  Niina Salminen-Vaparanta; Valdas Noreika; Antti Revonsuo; Mika Koivisto; Simo Vanni
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Mechanisms underlying rapid experience-dependent plasticity in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  B Boroojerdi; F Battaglia; W Muellbacher; L G Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Probing short-latency cortical inhibition in the visual cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation: A reliability study.

Authors:  Dalia Khammash; Molly Simmonite; Thad A Polk; Stephan F Taylor; Sean K Meehan
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-01-20       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the visual system. II. Characterization of induced phosphenes and scotomas.

Authors:  Thomas Kammer; Klaas Puls; Michael Erb; Wolfgang Grodd
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Cortical stimulation consolidates and reactivates visual experience: neural plasticity from magnetic entrainment of visual activity.

Authors:  Hsin-I Liao; Daw-An Wu; Neil Halelamien; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.