Literature DB >> 15919717

Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol applied to visual cortex of anaesthetized cat: effects on visually evoked single-unit activity.

Vera Moliadze1, Dimitrios Giannikopoulos, Ulf T Eysel, Klaus Funke.   

Abstract

In this study, we tested the paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (ppTMS) protocol - a conditioning stimulus (CS) given at variable intervals prior to a test stimulus (TS) - for visually evoked single-unit activity in cat primary visual cortex. We defined the TS as being supra-threshold when it caused a significant increase or decrease in the visually evoked activity. By systematically varying the interstimulus interval (ISI) between 2 and 30 ms and the strength of CS within the range 15-130% of TS, we found a clear dependence of the ppTMS effect on CS strength but little relation to ISI. The CS effect was strongest with an ISI of 3 ms and steadily declined for longer ISIs. A switch from enhancement of intracortical inhibition at short ISIs (2-5 ms, SICI) to intracortical facilitation (ICF) at longer ISIs (7-30 ms), as demonstrated for human motor cortex, was not evident. Whether the CS caused facilitation or suppression of the TS effect mainly depended on the strength of CS and the polarity of the TS effect: within a range of 60-130% a positive correlation between ppTMS and TS effect was evident, resulting in a stronger facilitation if the TS caused facilitation of visual activity, and more suppression if the TS was suppressive by itself. The correlation inverted when CS was reduced to 15-30%. The ppTMS effect was not simply the sum of the CS and TS effect, it was much smaller at weak CS strength (15-50%) but stronger than the sum of CS and TS effects at CS strength 60-100%. Differences in the physiological state between sensory and motor cortices and the interactions of paired synaptic inputs are discussed as possible reasons for the partly different effects of ppTMS in cat visual cortex and human motor cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15919717      PMCID: PMC1464771          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.086090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  24 in total

1.  Direct recordings of descending volleys after transcranial magnetic and electric motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; P Profice; A Insola; P Mazzone; P Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1999

2.  Interactions between two different inhibitory systems in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  T D Sanger; R R Garg; R Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Two phases of intracortical inhibition revealed by transcranial magnetic threshold tracking.

Authors:  R J Fisher; Y Nakamura; S Bestmann; J C Rothwell; H Bostock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Short-interval paired-pulse inhibition and facilitation of human motor cortex: the dimension of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Tihomir V Ilić; Frank Meintzschel; Ulrich Cleff; Diane Ruge; Kirn R Kessler; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Two phases of short-interval intracortical inhibition.

Authors:  Lailoma Roshan; Guillermo O Paradiso; Robert Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Excitability changes in human peripheral nerve axons in a paradigm mimicking paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Jane H L Chan; Cindy S-Y Lin; Emmanuel Pierrot-Deseilligny; David Burke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Intracortical origin of the short latency facilitation produced by pairs of threshold magnetic stimuli applied to human motor cortex.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; J C Rothwell; A Oliviero; P Profice; A Insola; P Mazzone; P Tonali
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Neocortex is the major target of sedative concentrations of volatile anaesthetics: strong depression of firing rates and increase of GABAA receptor-mediated inhibition.

Authors:  Harald Hentschke; Cornelius Schwarz; Bernd Antkowiak
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Paired transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols reveal a pattern of inhibition and facilitation in the human parietal cortex.

Authors:  M Oliveri; C Caltagirone; M M Filippi; R Traversa; P Cicinelli; P Pasqualetti; P M Rossini
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  1 Hz rTMS enhances extrastriate cortex activity in migraine: evidence of a reduced inhibition?

Authors:  B Fierro; R Ricci; A Piazza; S Scalia; G Giglia; G Vitello; F Brighina
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-11-25       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  17 in total

1.  Effects of repetitive TMS on visually evoked potentials and EEG in the anaesthetized cat: dependence on stimulus frequency and train duration.

Authors:  Selcen Aydin-Abidin; Vera Moliadze; Ulf T Eysel; Klaus Funke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  [Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in basic and clinical neuroscience research].

Authors:  A Valero-Cabré; A Pascual-Leone; O A Coubard
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.607

3.  Probing short-latency cortical inhibition in the visual cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation: A reliability study.

Authors:  Dalia Khammash; Molly Simmonite; Thad A Polk; Stephan F Taylor; Sean K Meehan
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-01-20       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  State-dependent variability of neuronal responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the visual cortex.

Authors:  Brian N Pasley; Elena A Allen; Ralph D Freeman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Mapping causal interregional influences with concurrent TMS-fMRI.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; Christian C Ruff; Felix Blankenburg; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Jon Driver; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Opposite impact on 14C-2-deoxyglucose brain metabolism following patterns of high and low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Antoni Valero-Cabré; Bertram R Payne; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  A chronometric exploration of high-resolution 'sensitive TMS masking' effects on subjective and objective measures of vision.

Authors:  Tom A de Graaf; Jim Herring; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Biomarkers Obtained by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Authors:  Ali Jannati; Mary A Ryan; Harper L Kaye; Melissa Tsuboyama; Alexander Rotenberg
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.177

9.  Cortical stimulation consolidates and reactivates visual experience: neural plasticity from magnetic entrainment of visual activity.

Authors:  Hsin-I Liao; Daw-An Wu; Neil Halelamien; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparing the efficacy of excitatory transcranial stimulation methods measuring motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  Vera Moliadze; Georg Fritzsche; Andrea Antal
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.