Literature DB >> 7612707

A methodology for the economic assessment of picture archiving and communication systems.

C P Langlotz1, O Even-Shoshan, S S Seshadri, I Brikman, S Kishore, H L Kundel, J S Schwartz.   

Abstract

Most economic studies of picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) to date, including our own, have focused on the perspectives of the radiology department and its direct costs. However, many researchers have suggested additional cost savings that may accrue to the medical center as a whole through increased operational capacity, fewer lost images, rapid simultaneous access to images, and other decreases in resource utilization. We describe here an economic analysis framework we have developed to estimate these potential additional savings. Our framework is comprised of two parallel measurement methods. The first method estimates the cost of care actually delivered through online capture of charge entries from the hospital's billing computer and from the clinical practices' billing database. Multiple regression analyses will be used to model cost of care, length of stay, and other estimates of resource utilization. The second method is the observational measurement of actual resource utilization, such as technologist time, frequency and duration of film searches, and equipment utilization rates. The costs associated with changes in resource use will be estimated using wage rates and other standard economic methods. Our working hypothesis is that after controlling for the underlying clinical and demographic differences among patients, patients imaged using a PACS will have shorter lengths of stay, shorter exam performance times, and decreased costs of care. We expect the results of our analysis to explain and resolve some of the conflicting views of the cost-effectiveness of PACS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7612707     DOI: 10.1007/BF03168132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  19 in total

Review 1.  Clinical economics. A guide to the economic analysis of clinical practices.

Authors:  J M Eisenberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-11-24       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The economic impact of technology on diagnostic imaging at a university medical center.

Authors:  R G Evens
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  A clinician's guide to cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  A S Detsky; I G Naglie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Cost vs safety. The use of low-osmolar contrast media.

Authors:  H W Fischer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Effect of a digital imaging network on physician behavior in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  D N De Simone; H L Kundel; R L Arenson; S B Seshadri; I S Brikman; S S Khalsa; M J Davey; N E Brisbon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Looking into the crystal ball: can we estimate the lifetime cost of rheumatoid arthritis?

Authors:  C Bombardier; J Eisenberg
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

8.  CT screening for comorbid disease in patients with prostatic carcinoma: is it cost-effective?

Authors:  H P Forman; J P Heiken; J A Brink; H S Glazer; L A Fox; B L McClennan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Breast cancer screening. A study in cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  G Mooney
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  The distinction between cost and charges.

Authors:  S A Finkler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for the promotion of computer applications in radiology in healthcare delivery.

Authors:  B Reiner; E Siegel; R Allman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Impact of filmless imaging on the frequency of clinician review of radiology images.

Authors:  B I Reiner; E L Siegel; F Hooper; Z Protopapas
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Emerging trends in the volume and format of outside examinations submitted for secondary interpretation.

Authors:  Christopher H Hunt; Christopher P Wood; Felix E Diehn; Laurence J Eckel; Kara M Schwartz; Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Multidisciplinary team meetings and their impact on workflow in radiology and pathology departments.

Authors:  Bridget Kane; Saturnino Luz; D Sean O'Briain; Ronan McDermott
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 8.775

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.