Literature DB >> 9730460

An algorithm combining age, total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and percent free PSA to predict prostate cancer: results on 4298 cases.

G D Carlson1, C B Calvanese, A W Partin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To (1) determine if patient age and total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels could enhance the ability of percent free PSA to distinguish prostate cancer from benign prostate disease within the 4.0 to 20 ng/mL total PSA range; (2) define the probability of prostate cancer based on patient age, total PSA, and percent free PSA; and (3) define a probability cutoff that distinguishes benign from malignant prostate disease.
METHODS: The 3773 urologically referred patients with serum PSA values between 4.0 and 20 ng/mL had a sextant biopsy diagnosed as either prostatic carcinoma (1234) or benign prostatic disease (2539) within 60 days of serum specimen collection. We created a logistic regression model, using patient age, total PSA, and percent free PSA, to assign a probability of prostate cancer, and tested the model on an additional data set (525 patients) to calculate sensitivity and specificity.
RESULTS: An 18% probability cutoff detected 95% of malignant biopsies and identified 34% of negative biopsies in the validation set. This approach yielded an 11% percentage point increase in specificity over percent free PSA alone. A 20% probability cutoff detected 90% of malignant cases and identified 42% of negative biopsies.
CONCLUSIONS: A prostate cancer probability based on age, total PSA, and percent free PSA is more effective than percent free PSA alone in differentiating benign prostate disease from prostate cancer. This model may assist physicians and patients regarding the need for biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9730460     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00205-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  19 in total

1.  Using biopsy to detect prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

2.  Chinese nomogram to predict probability of positive initial prostate biopsy: a study in Taiwan region.

Authors:  Shu-Chun Kuo; Shun-Hsing Hung; Hsien-Yi Wang; Chih-Chiang Chien; Chin-Li Lu; Hung-Jung Lin; How-Ran Guo; Jian-Fang Zou; Chian-Shiung Lin; Chien-Cheng Huang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Initial biopsy outcome prediction in Korean patients-comparison of a noble web-based Korean prostate cancer risk calculator versus prostate-specific antigen testing.

Authors:  Jae Young Park; Sungroh Yoon; Man Sik Park; Dae-Yeon Cho; Hong-Seok Park; Du Geon Moon; Duck Ki Yoon
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Assay-specific artificial neural networks for five different PSA assays and populations with PSA 2-10 ng/ml in 4,480 men.

Authors:  Carsten Stephan; Chuanliang Xu; Henning Cammann; Markus Graefen; Alexander Haese; Hartwig Huland; Axel Semjonow; Eleftherios P Diamandis; Mesut Remzi; Bob Djavan; Mark F Wildhagen; Bert G Blijenberg; Patrik Finne; Ulf-Hakan Stenman; Klaus Jung; Hellmuth-Alexander Meyer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

6.  Image-based clinical decision support for transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison of multiple logistic regression, artificial neural network, and support vector machine.

Authors:  Hak Jong Lee; Sung Il Hwang; Seok-Min Han; Seong Ho Park; Seung Hyup Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Chang Gyu Seong; Gheeyoung Choe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  DW-MRI of the urogenital tract: applications in oncology.

Authors:  G Petralia; H C Thoeny
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  [An artificial neural network as a tool in risk evaluation of prostate cancer. Indication for biopsy with the PSA range of 2-20 microg/l].

Authors:  C Stephan; B Vogel; H Cammann; M Lein; V Klevecka; P Sinha; G Kristiansen; D Schnorr; K Jung; S A Loening
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Potential predictive factors of positive prostate biopsy in the Japanese population.

Authors:  Katsumi Shigemura; Soichi Arakawa; Kunito Yamanaka; Nobuo Yasui; Shigeji Matsubara; Takahiro Iwamoto; Nobuo Kataoka; Keiji Yuien; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Development and validation of risk score for predicting positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy in a UK population.

Authors:  Mark A Rochester; Nora Pashayan; Fiona Matthews; Andrew Doble; John McLoughlin
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.