Literature DB >> 9730458

National trends in the epidemiology of prostate cancer, 1973 to 1994: evidence for the effectiveness of prostate-specific antigen screening.

A Farkas1, D Schneider, M Perrotti, K B Cummings, W S Ward.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to screen for prostate cancer remains controversial. Although it is still too early to measure directly the effects of PSA screening on mortality, we examined changes in the epidemiology of prostate cancer to determine if there is other evidence of the effectiveness of PSA as a screening tool.
METHODS: We examined trends in age at diagnosis, and age-adjusted trends in stage and grade at diagnosis, for 140,936 white and 15,662 African American men diagnosed with prostate cancer from 1973 to 1994 in the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results data base.
RESULTS: We found a significant downward trend in age at diagnosis, concomitant with a downward shift in stage of disease at diagnosis, starting with the advent of the PSA era in the late 1980s. We noted most cancers detected since the PSA era to be moderately well differentiated (International Classification of Diseases of the World Health Organization grade 2; Gleason score 5, 6, 7) and organ confined. Although findings were similar for both whites and African Americans, African Americans experienced a greater increase in poorly differentiated disease than did whites.
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the epidemiology of prostate cancer since the advent of the PSA era are consistent with the introduction of an effective screening test. This is evidenced by an increase in detection of significant prostate cancer in individuals who will likely benefit from treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9730458     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00242-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  24 in total

1.  PSA screening: the bottom line.

Authors:  M M Elhilali
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-03-21       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  A new view of radiation-induced cancer.

Authors:  I Shuryak; R K Sachs; D J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Solid tumor risks after high doses of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Rainer K Sachs; David J Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Accounting for apparent "reverse" racial disparities in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-based medical care: influence of out-of-VA care.

Authors:  Andrea D Gurmankin; Daniel Polsky; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Optimal cost-effective staging evaluations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gregory L Lacy; Douglas W Soderdahl; Javier Hernandez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Novel techniques for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: evidence of efficacy?

Authors:  Marnie R Robinson; Judd W Moul
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Does the presence of robotic surgery affect demographics in patients choosing to undergo radical prostatectomy? A multi-center contemporary analysis.

Authors:  Philippa J Cheetham; Daniel J Lee; Anna Rose-Morris; Simon F Brewster; Ketan K Badani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-07-10

8.  The rising prevalence of androgen deprivation among older American men since the advent of prostate-specific antigen testing: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Michael J Barry; Michael A Delorenzo; Elizabeth S Walker-Corkery; F Lee Lucas; David C Wennberg
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Is prostate cancer stage migration continuing for black men in the PSA era?

Authors:  R W Dobbs; D T Greenwald; H Wadhwa; V L Freeman; M R Abern
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 5.554

10.  Gleason score and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen in survival among patients with stage D2 prostate cancer.

Authors:  William D Figg; Michael E Franks; David Venzon; Paul Duray; Michael C Cox; W Marston Linehan; W Van Bingham; James A Eastham; Eddie Reed; Oliver Sartor
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.