Literature DB >> 15592675

Gleason score and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen in survival among patients with stage D2 prostate cancer.

William D Figg1, Michael E Franks, David Venzon, Paul Duray, Michael C Cox, W Marston Linehan, W Van Bingham, James A Eastham, Eddie Reed, Oliver Sartor.   

Abstract

Although multiple studies have addressed the prognostic importance of tumor differentiation in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, few data are available in patients with metastatic disease. We evaluated and compared survival data in two groups of men with Whitmore stage D2 metastatic prostate cancer initially treated with hormonal therapy. A series of 76 patients with D2 metastatic disease were evaluated and treated at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in conjunction with an additional cohort of 141 patients from the Louisiana State University School of Medicine (LSU). Pathological specimens were classified according to the Gleason score. Fifty-two (25%) of the combined NCI/LSU specimens had a Gleason score of 6 or less, 71 (34%) had a value of 7, and remaining 87 (41%) had scores between 8 and 10. The median PSA at the time of diagnosis for the NCI patients was 294.2 ng/ml. Time to treatment failure was defined as the time that a greater than 50% increase above nadir PSA was noted. In neither group was Gleason score correlated with overall survival. There was no association between the time to progression following hormone therapy and primary tumor Gleason score. The PSA concentration at the time of diagnosis was not correlated with the Gleason score for the NCI patients; however, there was an inverse correlation between pretreatment PSA level and time to progression following hormonal ablation. Gleason score does not appear to impact survival in metastatic prostate cancer. PSA as a marker of the biological behavior in metastatic disease may also be limited. These findings should be reevaluated in larger, better matched cohorts. Novel techniques such as serum proteomics, microarrays, and metastatic cell isolation methods may better predict outcome in advanced prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15592675     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-004-0443-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  45 in total

1.  How to compare results after surgery or radiation for localized prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  A molecular signature of metastasis in primary solid tumors.

Authors:  Sridhar Ramaswamy; Ken N Ross; Eric S Lander; Todd R Golub
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-12-09       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Prostate specific antigen in diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of prostate cancer.

Authors:  E H Cooper
Journal:  Prostate Suppl       Date:  1992

4.  Hormone therapy in prostatic cancer.

Authors:  W F WHITMORE
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1956-11       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Radical perineal prostatectomy: oncological outcome during a 20-year period.

Authors:  C E Iselin; J E Robertson; D F Paulson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Proteomic analysis of normal and malignant prostate tissue to identify novel proteins lost in cancer.

Authors:  Katie L Meehan; John W Holland; Hugh J S Dawkins
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  An interinstitutional and interspecialty comparison of treatment outcome data for patients with prostate carcinoma based on predefined prognostic categories and minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Frank A Vicini; Alvaro Martinez; Gerald Hanks; Alex Hanlon; Brian Miles; Ken Kernan; David Beyers; Haakon Ragde; Jeffrey Forman; James Fontanesi; Larry Kestin; Gyorgy Kovacs; Louis Denis; Kevin Slawin; Peter Scardino
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  Anthony V D'Amico; Richard Whittington; S Bruce Malkowicz; Kerri Cote; Marian Loffredo; Delray Schultz; Ming-Hui Chen; John E Tomaszewski; Andrew A Renshaw; Alan Wein; Jerome P Richie
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Prognostic significance of the nadir prostate specific antigen level after hormone therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Cheol Kwak; Seong Jin Jeong; Moon Soo Park; Eunsik Lee; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Long-term (15 years) results after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T2c or lower) prostate cancer.

Authors:  H Zincke; J E Oesterling; M L Blute; E J Bergstralh; R P Myers; D M Barrett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  3 in total

1.  Testicular metastases: a poor prognostic factor in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Fernando Korkes; Renato Gasperini; Karen Levy Korkes; Deusdedit Cortez Vieira Silva Neto; Marilia Germanos Castro
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The role of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α in determining the properties of castrate-resistant prostate cancers.

Authors:  Weranja K B Ranasinghe; Lin Xiao; Suzana Kovac; Mike Chang; Carine Michiels; Damien Bolton; Arthur Shulkes; Graham S Baldwin; Oneel Patel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Predictors of early androgen deprivation treatment failure in prostate cancer with bone metastases.

Authors:  Eberhard Varenhorst; Rami Klaff; Anders Berglund; Per Olov Hedlund; Gabriel Sandblom
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.452

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.