Literature DB >> 9729179

Is colonoscopy indicated for small adenomas found by screening flexible sigmoidoscopy?

M B Wallace1, J A Kemp, Y M Trnka, J M Donovan, F A Farraye.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is controversy over whether patients who have a small tubular adenoma on screening flexible sigmoidoscopy should undergo colonoscopic examination of the proximal colon.
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively determine the prevalence of advanced polyps in the proximal colon among patients who have small adenomas on screening sigmoidoscopy.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: A health maintenance organization and a Veterans Affairs medical center. PATIENTS: Asymptomatic patients older than 50 years of age who had no risk factors for colon cancer and underwent sigmoidoscopy. INTERVENTION: At the time of sigmoidoscopy, all polyps were biopsied and characterized. All patients with distal adenomas were offered colonoscopy. MEASUREMENTS: The size and histology of polyps identified by sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy were noted. Polyps were considered advanced if they were larger than 10 mm or were tubulovillous, villous, or malignant. The prevalence of advanced proximal polyps was determined, and patients were stratified by the size and number of distal polyps found by sigmoidoscopy.
RESULTS: Among 4490 patients who underwent sigmoidoscopy, a neoplastic lesion was detected in 401 (8.9%) and colonoscopy was done in 301 (75%). Of 90 patients with a single tubular adenoma 1 to 5 mm in diameter in the distal colon, 0% (95% CI, 0.0% to 4.0%) had an advanced proximal polyp compared with 5.4% (CI, 2.4% to 10.4%) of those who had multiple distal polyps 1 to 5 mm or 6 to 10 mm in diameter and 7.9% (CI, 2.6% to 17.6%) of those who had advanced distal polyps (P = 0.013 for trend). The low-risk group with a single tubular adenoma 1 to 5 mm in diameter represented 44% of all patients with distal adenomas or cancers found at flexible sigmoidoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing screening sigmoidoscopy, those with single tubular adenomas of 5 mm or less had a low prevalence of advanced proximal polyps. These patients may not benefit from colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9729179     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-4-199808150-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  14 in total

1.  Rectosigmoid findings are not associated with proximal colon cancer: analysis of 6 196 consecutive cases undergoing total colonoscopy.

Authors:  Makoto Okamoto; Takao Kawabe; Yutaka Yamaji; Jun Kato; Tsuneo Ikenoue; Goichi Togo; Haruhiko Yoshida; Yasushi Shiratori; Masao Omata
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Negative colorectal polyp biopsies: the utility of cutting deeper levels.

Authors:  Brian A Schick; Carolyn A McLean; David K Driman
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Impact of adenoma size in distal colon on risk for advanced adenoma of the proximal colon.

Authors:  Williamson B Strum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  The impact of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Luiz Ronaldo Alberti; David Correa Alves De Lima; Kelly Cristine De Lacerda Rodrigues; Marcos Paulo Lima Taranto; Sergio Henrique Leão Gonçalves; Andy Petroianu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Synchronous proximal polyps and cancer in patients with polyps detected at sigmoidoscopy: results of a single, rural-based sigmoidoscopy clinic.

Authors:  Thomas J McGarrity; Ahsan M Bhatti; David J Peters; Laurie P Peiffer; Arvind Kumar; Nicholas Inverso
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Impact of a family history of colorectal cancer on age at diagnosis, anatomic location, and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Williamson B Strum
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2005

7.  Impact of a family history of colorectal cancer on the prevalence of advanced adenomas of the rectosigmoid colon at flexible sigmoidoscopy in 3147 asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Williamson B Strum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Tailoring colorectal cancer screening by considering risk of advanced proximal neoplasia.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; Elizabeth A Glowinski; Ching Lin-Cooper; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  A risk profile for advanced proximal neoplasms on diagnostic colonoscopy.

Authors:  Thomas M Zarchy; Frank Tsai; Emily Ramicone; Linda S Chan
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Prevalence of colorectal neoplasms in Asian Americans.

Authors:  Khoa D Lam; Ruel T Garcia; Long H Nguyen; Huy Trinh; George Triadafilopoulos; Jeanine T Phan; Khanh Nguyen; Huy Nguyen; Aijaz Ahmed; Mindie H Nguyen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.