Literature DB >> 18535906

A risk profile for advanced proximal neoplasms on diagnostic colonoscopy.

Thomas M Zarchy1, Frank Tsai, Emily Ramicone, Linda S Chan.   

Abstract

The capacity for colonoscopy is limited and a method to prioritize patients for diagnostic colonoscopy is needed in health care centers. A retrospective cross-sectional cohort study was carried out in county and community endoscopy centers, which included 1,065 county and 279 community patients aged > or = 40 years undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. We constructed a risk profile for proximal advanced neoplasms on diagnostic colonoscopy at the county center based on the size of the regression coefficients for independent risk factors from logistic regression. An advanced neoplasm was defined as one of size > or = 1 cm or containing villous histology, high-grade dysplasia, or cancer. In our county colonoscopy population (n = 929 after exclusions), the stepwise logistic regression analysis identified age > or = 60 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.14, 6.14), iron deficiency anemia (AOR: 4.74; 95% CI: 2.07, 11.34), and an advanced neoplasm in the recto-sigmoid (AOR: 6.01; 95% CI: 2.02, 16.00) as the statistically significant predictors of an advanced proximal neoplasm. In the county population, the prevalence rates of an advanced proximal neoplasm and proximal high-grade dysplasia/cancer in the low-risk group were 0.71% (95% CI: 0.15, 2.05) and 0.24% (95% CI: 0.01, 1.31), respectively. Avoiding colonoscopy in this group would increase the capacity for colonoscopy by 46% in the higher risk groups. In a disparate community population (n = 237 after exclusions), this scoring system had a goodness-of-fit test showing high concordance (P = 0.51). This clinical profile stratified the risk for an advanced neoplasm proximal to the sigmoid in patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. It identified a large subset of low-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18535906     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-008-0328-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  39 in total

Review 1.  9. Appropriateness of colonoscopy: lower abdominal pain or constipation.

Authors:  V De Bosset; J J Gonvers; J P Vader; R W Dubois; B Burnand; F Froehlich
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Initial evaluation of rectal bleeding in young persons: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Alphonso Brown; A Russell Localio; J Sanford Schwartz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Importance of adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  T E Read; J D Read; L F Butterly
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Kenneth Song
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Nereo Segnan; Carlo Senore; Bruno Andreoni; Alberto Azzoni; Luigi Bisanti; Alessandro Cardelli; Guido Castiglione; Cristiano Crosta; Andrea Ederle; Alberto Fantin; Arnaldo Ferrari; Mario Fracchia; Franco Ferrero; Stefano Gasperoni; Serafino Recchia; Mauro Risio; Tiziana Rubeca; Giorgio Saracco; Marco Zappa
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  A prospective study of family history and the risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C S Fuchs; E L Giovannucci; G A Colditz; D J Hunter; F E Speizer; W C Willett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Do characteristics of adenomas on flexible sigmoidoscopy predict advanced lesions on baseline colonoscopy?

Authors:  T M Zarchy; D Ershoff
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy.

Authors:  Pauline A Mysliwiec; Martin L Brown; Carrie N Klabunde; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Natural history of untreated colonic polyps.

Authors:  S J Stryker; B G Wolff; C E Culp; S D Libbe; D M Ilstrup; R L MacCarty
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 22.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.