Literature DB >> 11855546

Synchronous proximal polyps and cancer in patients with polyps detected at sigmoidoscopy: results of a single, rural-based sigmoidoscopy clinic.

Thomas J McGarrity1, Ahsan M Bhatti, David J Peters, Laurie P Peiffer, Arvind Kumar, Nicholas Inverso.   

Abstract

The prevalence of polyps and cancer in the proximal colon among patients who have polyps detected on sigmoidoscopy was determined in a large rural referral hospital in north central Pennsylvania. Eleven thousand one hundred sixty patients underwent sigmoidoscopy between 1991 and 1997. Polyps were detected in 709 patients. Five hundred twenty-three patients who had a polyp at sigmoidoscopy and full colonoscopy completed within one year were included in this study. 120 patients (23%) had a proximal polyp detected at colonoscopy. The prevalence of proximal polyps and histologically advanced polyps was related to the size, number, and histology of the distal index polyp found at sigmoidoscopy. However, the absolute difference in prevalence of proximal polyps stratified by dings at sigmoidoscopy was small. A total of 5 adenocarcinomas were detected in the proximal colon. All proximal cancers detected at colonoscopy occurred in patients with a distal polyp less than 10 mm. Our data emphasize the importance of colonoscopy in all patients with a polyp detected at sigmoidoscopy independent of its size and histology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11855546     DOI: 10.1023/a:1013761803966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  45 in total

1.  Triage by flexible sigmoidoscopy: inevitably "short-sighted".

Authors:  D A Ahlquist
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Potential costs of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  J R Marshall; D Fay; P Lance
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Colonoscopic screening of persons with suspected risk factors for colon cancer: II. Past history of colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  S Grossman; M L Milos; I S Tekawa; N P Jewell
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  The Colon Cancer Prevention Program (CoCaP): rationale, implementation, and preliminary results.

Authors:  A M Palitz; J V Selby; S Grossman; L J Finkler; M Bevc; C Kehr; C A Conell
Journal:  HMO Pract       Date:  1997-03

5.  The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate.

Authors:  R E Schoen; L D Gerber; C Margulies
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Importance of adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  T E Read; J D Read; L F Butterly
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Polyps of the large intestine in Northern Norway.

Authors:  T J Eide; H Stalsberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Do characteristics of adenomas on flexible sigmoidoscopy predict advanced lesions on baseline colonoscopy?

Authors:  T M Zarchy; D Ershoff
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Natural history of untreated colonic polyps.

Authors:  S J Stryker; B G Wolff; C E Culp; S D Libbe; D M Ilstrup; R L MacCarty
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Clinical significance of diminutive polyps of the rectum and sigmoid colon.

Authors:  C N Ellis; H W Boggs; G W Slagle; P A Cole; D J Coyle
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.