Literature DB >> 2069176

Analysis of the spontaneous speech samples of children with cochlear implants or tactile aids.

M J Osberger1, A M Robbins, S W Berry, S L Todd, L J Hesketh, A Sedey.   

Abstract

Analyses were performed on the spontaneous speech samples produced by profoundly hearing-impaired children who used the 3M/House single-channel cochlear implant (n = 7), the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant (n = 7), or the two-channel tactile aid, the Tactaid II (n = 12). Speech recordings were obtained in the predevice condition, and after 6- and 12-months use. The speech of the children in the three experimental groups was compared to that of a control group of subjects who used a tactile aid inconsistently and received minimal speech training. Several new analysis procedures were developed to describe adequately the characteristics of the children's speech. The results revealed that all three experimental groups and the control group showed an increase in their production of sounds classified as English phonemes in the postdevice conditions. It was apparent at both the 6- and 12-months postdevice intervals that the most dramatic improvements were made by the users of the Nucleus device. The changes made by the Tactaid and 3M/House users were similar. The subjects with the Nucleus device also developed more diverse phonetic repertoires over time than did the other experimental subjects. More subjects with the Nucleus device acquired fricatives, liquids, glides, voiceless consonants, and high front vowels than did the subjects in the other groups. The subjects in the control group developed the most limited phonetic repertoires.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2069176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otol        ISSN: 0192-9763


  7 in total

1.  A comparison of language achievement in children with cochlear implants and children using hearing aids.

Authors:  J B Tomblin; L Spencer; S Flock; R Tyler; B Gantz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The ear is connected to the brain: some new directions in the study of children with cochlear implants at Indiana University.

Authors:  Derek M Houston; Jessica Beer; Tonya R Bergeson; Steven B Chin; David B Pisoni; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Imitation of nonwords by hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants: segmental analyses.

Authors:  Caitlin M Dillon; Miranda Cleary; David B Pisoni; Allyson K Carter
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.346

4.  The production of English inflectional morphology, speech production and listening performance in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  L J Spencer; N Tye-Murray; J B Tomblin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Acquisition of speech by children who have prolonged cochlear implant experience.

Authors:  N Tye-Murray; L Spencer; G G Woodworth
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-04

6.  Nonword imitation by children with cochlear implants: consonant analyses.

Authors:  Caitlin Dillon; David B Pisoni; Miranda Cleary; Allyson K Carter
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-05

7.  Acoustic analysis of speech of cochlear implantees and its implications.

Authors:  Anjali R Kant; Rajesh Patadia; Prajakta Govale; R Rangasayee; Milind Kirtane
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.372

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.