Literature DB >> 9724765

Adult fitness consequences of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster.

D E Promislow1, E A Smith, L Pearse.   

Abstract

Few experiments have demonstrated a genetic correlation between the process of sexual selection and fitness benefits in offspring, either through female choice or male competition. Those that have looked at the relationship between female choice and offspring fitness have focused on juvenile fitness components, rather than fitness at later stages in the life cycle. In addition, many of these studies have not controlled for possible maternal effects. To test for a relationship between sexual selection and adult fitness, we carried out an artificial selection experiment in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. We created two treatments that varied in the level of opportunity for sexual selection. Increased opportunity for female choice and male competition was genetically correlated with an increase in adult survivorship, as well as an increase in male and female body size. Contrary to previous, single-generation studies, we did not find an increase in larval competitive ability. This study demonstrates that mate choice and/or male-male competition are correlated with an increase in at least one adult fitness component of offspring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9724765      PMCID: PMC27956          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  Sex-specific quantitative trait loci affecting longevity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S V Nuzhdin; E G Pasyukova; C L Dilda; Z B Zeng; T F Mackay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mutation and senescence: where genetics and demography meet.

Authors:  D E Promislow; M Tatar
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Rapid decline of fitness in panmictic populations of Drosophila melanogaster maintained under relaxed natural selection.

Authors:  S A Shabalina; A S Kondrashov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A density threshold for the expression of longevity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L S Luckinbill; M J Clare
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  The costs of choice in sexual selection.

Authors:  A Pomiankowski
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1987-09-21       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Female choice selects for a viability-based male trait in pheasants.

Authors:  T von Schantz; G Göransson; G Andersson; I Fröberg; M Grahn; A Helgée; H Wittzell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-01-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Quantitative Genetics of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. Sexual Dimorphism in Genetic Parameters for Wing Traits.

Authors:  D E Cowley; W R Atchley; J J Rutledge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Methods for evaluating the heterogeneity of aging processes in human populations using vital statistics data: explaining the black/white mortality crossover by a model of mortality selection.

Authors:  K G Manton; E Stallard
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 0.553

9.  Ultraviolet plumage colors predict mate preferences in starlings.

Authors:  A T Bennett; I C Cuthill; J C Partridge; K Lunau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Age-specific patterns of genetic variance in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Mortality.

Authors:  D E Promislow; M Tatar; A A Khazaeli; J W Curtsinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  17 in total

1.  Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load.

Authors:  B Holland; W R Rice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Nonadditive indirect effects of group genetic diversity on larval viability in Drosophila melanogaster imply key role of maternal decision-making.

Authors:  Julia B Saltz; Evan T Alicuben; Jessica Grubman; Matthew Harkenrider; Nichelle Megowan; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 3.  Detecting sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic coevolution.

Authors:  Locke Rowe; Troy Day
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection.

Authors:  B Hollis; D Houle
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Heritability of body mass, a sexually selected trait, in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix).

Authors:  V K Iyengar; T Eisner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Moving Speciation Genetics Forward: Modern Techniques Build on Foundational Studies in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dean M Castillo; Daniel A Barbash
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Susceptibility of the male fitness phenotype to spontaneous mutation.

Authors:  Martin A Mallet; Christopher M Kimber; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Quantifying the gender load: can population crosses reveal interlocus sexual conflict?

Authors:  Tristan A F Long; Robert Montgomerie; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  New candidate genes for sex-comb divergence between Drosophila mauritiana and Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Rita M Graze; Olga Barmina; Daniel Tufts; Elena Naderi; Kristy L Harmon; Maria Persianinova; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Allelic polymorphism at foxo contributes to local adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Nicolas J Betancourt; Subhash Rajpurohit; Esra Durmaz; Daniel K Fabian; Martin Kapun; Thomas Flatt; Paul Schmidt
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.