Literature DB >> 16612894

Quantifying the gender load: can population crosses reveal interlocus sexual conflict?

Tristan A F Long1, Robert Montgomerie, Adam K Chippindale.   

Abstract

Six sister populations of Drosophila melanogaster kept under identical environmental conditions for greater than 600 generations were reciprocally crossed to investigate the incidence of population divergence in allopatry. Population crosses directly influenced fitness, mating frequency, and sperm competition patterns. Changes in both female remating rate and the outcome of male sperm competition (P1, P2) in response to foreign males were consistent with intersexual coevolution. Moreover, seven of the 30 crosses between foreign mates resulted in significant reductions in female fitness, whereas two resulted in significant increases, compared to local matings. This tendency for foreign males to reduce female fitness may be interpreted as evidence for either sexually antagonistic coevolution or the disruption of mutualistic interactions. However, instances in which female fitness improved via cohabitation with foreign males may better reveal sexual conflict, signalling release from the cost of interacting with locally adapted males. By this metric, female reproduction in D. melanogaster is strongly constrained by local adaptation by males, a situation that would promote antagonistic coevolution between the sexes. We conclude that sexual selection can promote population differentiation in allopatry and that sexual conflict is likely to have played a role in population differentiation in this study system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16612894      PMCID: PMC1569607          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  30 in total

1.  The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict.

Authors:  S Gavrilets; G Arnqvist; U Friberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Courtship in Drosophila.

Authors:  R J Greenspan; J F Ferveur
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Sexual selection and speciation.

Authors:  T M. Panhuis; R Butlin; M Zuk; T Tregenza
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Natural selection and genetic variation for female resistance to harm from males.

Authors:  J E Linder; W R Rice
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 6.  Sexual conflict and speciation.

Authors:  G A Parker; L Partridge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Cryptic female choice in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (L.).

Authors:  P I Ward
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Conflict, receiver bias and the evolution of signal form.

Authors:  A Arak; M Enquist
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  The effects of inbreeding on body weight and abdominal chaeta number in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J F Kidwell; M M Kidwell
Journal:  Can J Genet Cytol       Date:  1966-06

10.  Heritability of pre-adult viability differences can explain apparent heritability of sperm displacement ability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A S Gilchrist; L Partridge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  The evolutionary outcome of sexual conflict.

Authors:  C M Lessells
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Detecting sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic coevolution.

Authors:  Locke Rowe; Troy Day
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Introduction. Sexual conflict: a new paradigm?

Authors:  T Tregenza; N Wedell; T Chapman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Sexual conflict and the gender load: correlated evolution between population fitness and sexual dimorphism in seed beetles.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Midori Tuda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Genetic trade-offs between male reproductive traits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  David C S Filice; Tristan A F Long
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Genetic variation in male-induced harm in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  David C S Filice; Tristan A F Long
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Strain-dependent differences in several reproductive traits are not accompanied by early postmating transcriptome changes in female Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Lisa A McGraw; Greg Gibson; Andrew G Clark; Mariana F Wolfner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Effective population size and evolutionary dynamics in outbred laboratory populations of Drosophila.

Authors:  Laurence D Mueller; Amitabh Joshi; Marta Santos; Michael R Rose
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.166

9.  Male × female interaction for a pre-copulatory trait, but not a post-copulatory trait, among cosmopolitan populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alison Pischedda; Andrew D Stewart; Monica K Little
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic coevolution in an annual plant.

Authors:  Josefin A Madjidian; Asa Lankinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.