Literature DB >> 9719660

Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Decisions: The Role of Counterfactual Thought in the Experience of Regret and Disappointment.

.   

Abstract

Regret and disappointment are emotions that can be experienced in response to an unfavorable outcome of a decision. Previous research suggests that both emotions are related to the process of counterfactual thinking. The present research extends this idea by combining it with ideas from regret and disappointment theory. The results show that regret is related to behavior-focused counterfactual thought in which the decision-maker's own actions are changed, whereas disappointment is related to situation-focused counterfactual thought in which aspects of the situation are changed. In Study 1 participants (N = 130) were asked to recall an autobiographical episode of either a regretful or a disappointing event. When asked to undo this event, regret participants predominantly changed their own actions, whereas disappointment participants predominantly changed aspects of the situation. In Study 2 all participants (N = 50) read a scenario in which a person experiences a negative event. Participants who were instructed to undo the event by changing the person's actions reported more regret than disappointment, while participants who were instructed to undo the event by changing aspects of the situation reported more disappointment than regret. Study 3 (N = 140) replicated the findings from Study 2 with a different scenario, and a design in which regret and disappointment were measured between rather than within subjects. In the discussion we address the relation among counterfactual thinking, attributions and affective reactions to decision outcomes, and the implications for decision research. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9719660     DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process        ISSN: 0749-5978


  24 in total

Review 1.  Counterfactual thinking and decision making.

Authors:  N Roese
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-12

2.  Controllability and hindsight components: Understanding opposite hindsight biases for self-relevant negative event outcomes.

Authors:  Hartmut Blank; Jan H Peters
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

3.  Children's competence or adults' incompetence: different developmental trajectories in different tasks.

Authors:  Sarah Furlan; Franca Agnoli; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2012-11-12

4.  Self-report captures 27 distinct categories of emotion bridged by continuous gradients.

Authors:  Alan S Cowen; Dacher Keltner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The evolutionary roots of human decision making.

Authors:  Laurie R Santos; Alexandra G Rosati
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the decision regret scale in recipients of internal cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Ronald L Hickman; Melissa D Pinto; Eunsuk Lee; Barbara J Daly
Journal:  J Nurs Meas       Date:  2012

7.  Striatal sensitivity to personal responsibility in a regret-based decision-making task.

Authors:  N Camille; V A Pironti; C M Dodds; M R F Aitken; T W Robbins; L Clark
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Praise for regret: People value regret above other negative emotions.

Authors:  Colleen Saffrey; Amy Summerville; Neal J Roese
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2008-03

9.  Can contrast effects regulate emotions? A follow-up study of vital loss decisions.

Authors:  Qi Li; Yue Qi; Xianyun Liu; Jing Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chimpanzees and bonobos exhibit emotional responses to decision outcomes.

Authors:  Alexandra G Rosati; Brian Hare
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.