Literature DB >> 28874542

Self-report captures 27 distinct categories of emotion bridged by continuous gradients.

Alan S Cowen1, Dacher Keltner2.   

Abstract

Emotions are centered in subjective experiences that people represent, in part, with hundreds, if not thousands, of semantic terms. Claims about the distribution of reported emotional states and the boundaries between emotion categories-that is, the geometric organization of the semantic space of emotion-have sparked intense debate. Here we introduce a conceptual framework to analyze reported emotional states elicited by 2,185 short videos, examining the richest array of reported emotional experiences studied to date and the extent to which reported experiences of emotion are structured by discrete and dimensional geometries. Across self-report methods, we find that the videos reliably elicit 27 distinct varieties of reported emotional experience. Further analyses revealed that categorical labels such as amusement better capture reports of subjective experience than commonly measured affective dimensions (e.g., valence and arousal). Although reported emotional experiences are represented within a semantic space best captured by categorical labels, the boundaries between categories of emotion are fuzzy rather than discrete. By analyzing the distribution of reported emotional states we uncover gradients of emotion-from anxiety to fear to horror to disgust, calmness to aesthetic appreciation to awe, and others-that correspond to smooth variation in affective dimensions such as valence and dominance. Reported emotional states occupy a complex, high-dimensional categorical space. In addition, our library of videos and an interactive map of the emotional states they elicit (https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/emogifs/map.html) are made available to advance the science of emotion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dimensions; discrete emotion; emotional experience; semantic space

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28874542      PMCID: PMC5617253          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1702247114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  74 in total

1.  The CAD triad hypothesis: a mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity).

Authors:  P Rozin; L Lowery; S Imada; J Haidt
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-04

2.  Fear, anger, and risk.

Authors:  J S Lerner; D Keltner
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-07

3.  Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI.

Authors:  K Luan Phan; Tor Wager; Stephan F Taylor; Israel Liberzon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Belief and feeling: evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report.

Authors:  Michael D Robinson; Gerald L Clore
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion.

Authors:  James A Russell
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Valence, gender, and lateralization of functional brain anatomy in emotion: a meta-analysis of findings from neuroimaging.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; K Luan Phan; Israel Liberzon; Stephan F Taylor
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  High frequency of facial expressions corresponding to confusion, concentration, and worry in an analysis of naturally occurring facial expressions of Americans.

Authors:  Paul Rozin; Adam B Cohen
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2003-03

8.  Can people feel happy and sad at the same time?

Authors:  J T Larsen; A P McGraw; J T Cacioppo
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-10

Review 9.  Parsing reward.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 10.  What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire.

Authors:  Lisa M Diamond
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  64 in total

1.  Words are a context for mental inference.

Authors:  Nicole Betz; Katie Hoemann; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-01-10

2.  Mapping 24 emotions conveyed by brief human vocalization.

Authors:  Alan S Cowen; Hillary Anger Elfenbein; Petri Laukka; Dacher Keltner
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2018-12-20

3.  How to Interpret Resting-State fMRI: Ask Your Participants.

Authors:  Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Julia W Y Kam; Colin W Hoy; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The rise of prosociality in fiction preceded democratic revolutions in Early Modern Europe.

Authors:  Mauricio de Jesus Dias Martins; Nicolas Baumard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dramatic action: A theater-based paradigm for analyzing human interactions.

Authors:  Yuvalal Liron; Noa Raindel; Uri Alon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  What the face displays: Mapping 28 emotions conveyed by naturalistic expression.

Authors:  Alan S Cowen; Dacher Keltner
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2019-06-17

7.  The Physical and the Emotional: Case Report, Mixed-Methods Development, and Discussion.

Authors:  Brandon C Yarns; Kenneth B Wells; Denise Fan; Norma Mtume; Elizabeth Bromley
Journal:  Psychodyn Psychiatry       Date:  2018-12

8.  Neural patterns during anticipation predict emotion regulation success for reappraisal.

Authors:  Elektra Schubert; James A Agathos; Maja Brydevall; Daniel Feuerriegel; Peter Koval; Carmen Morawetz; Stefan Bode
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  What Basic Emotion Theory Really Says for the Twenty-First Century Study of Emotion.

Authors:  Dacher Keltner; Jessica L Tracy; Disa Sauter; Alan Cowen
Journal:  J Nonverbal Behav       Date:  2019-02-13

10.  Intersubject representational similarity analysis reveals individual variations in affective experience when watching erotic movies.

Authors:  Pin-Hao A Chen; Eshin Jolly; Jin Hyun Cheong; Luke J Chang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.