Literature DB >> 9717884

G-estimation of causal effects: isolated systolic hypertension and cardiovascular death in the Framingham Heart Study.

J C Witteman1, R B D'Agostino, T Stijnen, W B Kannel, J C Cobb, M A de Ridder, A Hofman, J M Robins.   

Abstract

Time-dependent covariates are often both confounders and intermediate variables. In the presence of such covariates, standard approaches for adjustment for confounding are biased. The method of G-estimation allows for appropriate adjustment. Previous studies applying the G-estimation method have addressed effects on all-cause mortality rather than on specific causes of death. In the present study, a method to adjust for censoring by competing risks is presented. The authors used the approach to estimate the causal effect of isolated systolic hypertension on cardiovascular mortality in the Framingham Heart Study, with a 10-year follow-up using data from 1956 to 1970. Arterial rigidity is a major determinant of isolated systolic hypertension and may be a confounder of the relation between isolated systolic hypertension and cardiovascular death. Conversely, isolated systolic hypertension may by itself contribute to stiffening of the vessel wall, and arterial rigidity may therefore also be an intermediate variable in the causal pathway from isolated systolic hypertension to cardiovascular death. While controlling for arterial rigidity and other baseline and time-dependent covariates, isolated systolic hypertension decreased the time to cardiovascular death by 45% (95% confidence interval 3-69).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9717884     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  24 in total

1.  Individual causal models and population system models in epidemiology.

Authors:  J S Koopman; J W Lynch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Confounding and confounders.

Authors:  R McNamee
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Healthy worker survivor bias in the Colorado Plateau uranium miners cohort.

Authors:  Alexander P Keil; David B Richardson; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Causal inference in occupational epidemiology: accounting for the healthy worker effect by using structural nested models.

Authors:  Ashley I Naimi; David B Richardson; Stephen R Cole
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  The Implications of Using Lagged and Baseline Exposure Terms in Longitudinal Causal and Regression Models.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Ashley I Naimi; Sander Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  MIMICKING COUNTERFACTUAL OUTCOMES TO ESTIMATE CAUSAL EFFECTS.

Authors:  Judith J Lok
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.028

7.  Penalized regression procedures for variable selection in the potential outcomes framework.

Authors:  Debashis Ghosh; Yeying Zhu; Donna L Coffman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  A latent variable approach to potential outcomes for emergency department admission decisions.

Authors:  Amy L Cochran; Paul J Rathouz; Keith E Kocher; Gabriel Zayas-Cabán
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Bayesian bias adjustments of the lung cancer SMR in a cohort of German carbon black production workers.

Authors:  Peter Morfeld; Robert J McCunney
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.646

10.  Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs.

Authors:  Ian Shrier; Robert W Platt
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.