Literature DB >> 24077092

Causal inference in occupational epidemiology: accounting for the healthy worker effect by using structural nested models.

Ashley I Naimi, David B Richardson, Stephen R Cole.   

Abstract

In a recent issue of the Journal, Kirkeleit et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2013;177(11):1218-1224) provided empirical evidence for the potential of the healthy worker effect in a large cohort of Norwegian workers across a range of occupations. In this commentary, we provide some historical context, define the healthy worker effect by using causal diagrams, and use simulated data to illustrate how structural nested models can be used to estimate exposure effects while accounting for the healthy worker survivor effect in 4 simple steps. We provide technical details and annotated SAS software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina) code corresponding to the example analysis in the Web Appendices, available at http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  causal inference; healthy worker effect; marginal structural models; occupational epidemiology; structural nested models

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24077092      PMCID: PMC3858107          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  32 in total

1.  Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias.

Authors:  Sander Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  G-estimation and artificial censoring: problems, challenges, and applications.

Authors:  Marshall M Joffe; Wei Peter Yang; Harold Feldman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Controlling the healthy worker survivor effect: an example of arsenic exposure and respiratory cancer.

Authors:  H M Arrighi; I Hertz-Picciotto
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Identifiability, exchangeability, and epidemiological confounding.

Authors:  S Greenland; J M Robins
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 5.  The evolving concept of the healthy worker survivor effect.

Authors:  H M Arrighi; I Hertz-Picciotto
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Estimating the causal effect of smoking cessation in the presence of confounding factors using a rank preserving structural failure time model.

Authors:  S D Mark; J M Robins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Estimating the effect of cumulative occupational asbestos exposure on time to lung cancer mortality: using structural nested failure-time models to account for healthy-worker survivor bias.

Authors:  Ashley I Naimi; Stephen R Cole; Michael G Hudgens; David B Richardson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  A simulation study of finite-sample properties of marginal structural Cox proportional hazards models.

Authors:  Daniel Westreich; Stephen R Cole; Enrique F Schisterman; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  The healthy worker effect in cancer incidence studies.

Authors:  Jorunn Kirkeleit; Trond Riise; Tone Bjørge; David C Christiani
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Quantification of the healthy worker effect: a nationwide cohort study among electricians in Denmark.

Authors:  Lau C Thygesen; Ulla A Hvidtfeldt; Sigurd Mikkelsen; Henrik Brønnum-Hansen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  13 in total

1.  Cohort Profile: The International Nuclear Workers Study (INWORKS).

Authors:  Ghassan B Hamra; David B Richardson; Elisabeth Cardis; Robert D Daniels; Michael Gillies; Jacqueline A O'Hagan; Richard Haylock; Dominique Laurier; Klervi Leuraud; Monika Moissonnier; Mary Schubauer-Berigan; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Ausrele Kesminiene
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Invited commentary: Estimating population impact in the presence of competing events.

Authors:  Ashley I Naimi; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Construct validity of SF-6D health state utility values in an employed population.

Authors:  Siyan Baxter; Kristy Sanderson; Alison Venn; Petr Otahal; Andrew J Palmer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Asbestos standards: Impact of currently uncounted chrysotile asbestos fibers on lifetime lung cancer risk.

Authors:  David B Richardson; Alexander P Keil; Stephen R Cole; John Dement
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Exposure-response assessment of cancer mortality in styrene-exposed boatbuilders.

Authors:  Robert Douglas Daniels; Stephen J Bertke
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Are all biases missing data problems?

Authors:  Chanelle J Howe; Lauren E Cain; Joseph W Hogan
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2015-07-12

7.  Factors affecting workforce participation and healthy worker biases in U.S. women and men.

Authors:  Candice Y Johnson; Carissa M Rocheleau; Christina C Lawson; Barbara Grajewski; Penelope P Howards
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Psychosocial Stressors at Work and the Risk of Sickness Absence Due to a Diagnosed Mental Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caroline S Duchaine; Karine Aubé; Mahée Gilbert-Ouimet; Michel Vézina; Ruth Ndjaboué; Victoria Massamba; Denis Talbot; Mathilde Lavigne-Robichaud; Xavier Trudel; Ana-Paula Bruno Pena-Gralle; Alain Lesage; Lynne Moore; Alain Milot; Danielle Laurin; Chantal Brisson
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 21.596

9.  The incidence risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in female nurses: a nationwide matched cohort study.

Authors:  Hsiu-Ling Huang; Cheng-Chin Pan; Shun-Mu Wang; Pei-Tseng Kung; Wen-Yu Chou; Wen-Chen Tsai
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Lower risk of end stage renal disease in diabetic nurse.

Authors:  Cheng-Chin Pan; Hsiu-Ling Huang; Ming-Chih Chen; Chuan-Yu Kung; Pei-Tseng Kung; Wen-Yu Chou; Wen-Chen Tsai
Journal:  Biomedicine (Taipei)       Date:  2017-11-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.