Literature DB >> 25628185

Penalized regression procedures for variable selection in the potential outcomes framework.

Debashis Ghosh1, Yeying Zhu, Donna L Coffman.   

Abstract

A recent topic of much interest in causal inference is model selection. In this article, we describe a framework in which to consider penalized regression approaches to variable selection for causal effects. The framework leads to a simple 'impute, then select' class of procedures that is agnostic to the type of imputation algorithm as well as penalized regression used. It also clarifies how model selection involves a multivariate regression model for causal inference problems and that these methods can be applied for identifying subgroups in which treatment effects are homogeneous. Analogies and links with the literature on machine learning methods, missing data, and imputation are drawn. A difference least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm is defined, along with its multiple imputation analogs. The procedures are illustrated using a well-known right-heart catheterization dataset.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  L1 penalty; average causal effect; counterfactual; imputed data; treatment heterogeneity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25628185      PMCID: PMC4390482          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  16 in total

1.  Marginal structural models as a tool for standardization.

Authors:  Tosiya Sato; Yutaka Matsuyama
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jared K Lunceford; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Bayesian effect estimation accounting for adjustment uncertainty.

Authors:  Chi Wang; Giovanni Parmigiani; Francesca Dominici
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  On model selection and model misspecification in causal inference.

Authors:  Stijn Vansteelandt; Maarten Bekaert; Gerda Claeskens
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; James M Robins
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  How should variable selection be performed with multiply imputed data?

Authors:  Angela M Wood; Ian R White; Patrick Royston
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

8.  Variable selection for multiply-imputed data with application to dioxin exposure study.

Authors:  Qixuan Chen; Sijian Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators.

Authors:  A F Connors; T Speroff; N V Dawson; C Thomas; F E Harrell; D Wagner; N Desbiens; L Goldman; A W Wu; R M Califf; W J Fulkerson; H Vidaillet; S Broste; P Bellamy; J Lynn; W A Knaus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-09-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The SUPPORT prognostic model. Objective estimates of survival for seriously ill hospitalized adults. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments.

Authors:  W A Knaus; F E Harrell; J Lynn; L Goldman; R S Phillips; A F Connors; N V Dawson; W J Fulkerson; R M Califf; N Desbiens; P Layde; R K Oye; P E Bellamy; R B Hakim; D P Wagner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  7 in total

1.  Joint sufficient dimension reduction and estimation of conditional and average treatment effects.

Authors:  Ming-Yueh Huang; Kwun Chuen Gary Chan
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  Estimating Individual Treatment Effect in Observational Data Using Random Forest Methods.

Authors:  Min Lu; Saad Sadiq; Daniel J Feaster; Hemant Ishwaran
Journal:  J Comput Graph Stat       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.302

3.  Model-averaged confounder adjustment for estimating multivariate exposure effects with linear regression.

Authors:  Ander Wilson; Corwin M Zigler; Chirag J Patel; Francesca Dominici
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Doubly robust matching estimators for high dimensional confounding adjustment.

Authors:  Joseph Antonelli; Matthew Cefalu; Nathan Palmer; Denis Agniel
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  XGBoost-Based Framework for Smoking-Induced Noncommunicable Disease Prediction.

Authors:  Khishigsuren Davagdorj; Van Huy Pham; Nipon Theera-Umpon; Keun Ho Ryu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Identification of hospital cost drivers using sparse group lasso.

Authors:  Piotr Swierkowski; Adrian Barnett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Incorporating repeated measurements into prediction models in the critical care setting: a framework, systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joost D J Plate; Rutger R van de Leur; Luke P H Leenen; Falco Hietbrink; Linda M Peelen; M J C Eijkemans
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 4.615

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.