Literature DB >> 16830374

Results of gastroscope bacterial decontamination by enzymatic detergent compared to chlorhexidine.

Rungsun Rerknimitr1, Sorapat Eakthunyasakul, Pongpan Nunthapisud, Pradermchai Kongkam.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the efficacy of enzymatic detergent with chlorhexidine for gastroscope bacterial decontamination.
METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled study was undertaken to evaluate the ability of these 2 agents to achieve high level disinfection in a gastroscope. A total of 260 samples were collected from 5 different gastroscopes. Manual cleaning was done for 10 min with these 2 agents separately (n = 130 each). Then all specimens underwent 2% glutaraldehyde soaking for 20 min. After 70% alcohol was rinsed, sterile normal saline was flushed into each gastroscope channel and 40 mL of sample was collected. The sample was sent for aerobic bacterial culture after membrane was filtered. A colony count greater than 200 cfu/mL was considered significant.
RESULTS: The positive culture rate was 4.6% in the enzymatic detergent arm and 3.1% in the chlorhexidine arm. Pseudomonas species were the main organism detected from both groups (60%). Multiple organisms were found from 4 specimens (enzymatic detergent arm = 1, chlorhexidine arm = 3).
CONCLUSION: The contamination rate of both types of cleaning solution is equivalent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16830374      PMCID: PMC4087373          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  18 in total

1.  Guidelines on cleaning and disinfection in GI endoscopy. Update 1999. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Recommended practices for cleaning and processing endoscopes and endoscope accessories.

Authors: 
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 0.676

3.  Surveillance cultures to monitor quality of gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing.

Authors:  Frank M Moses; Jennifer Lee
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Multi-society guideline for reprocessing flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Removal of biofilm from endoscopes: evaluation of detergent efficiency.

Authors:  Karen Vickery; Aniko Pajkos; Yvonne Cossart
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Natural bioburden levels detected on flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes after clinical use and manual cleaning.

Authors:  N S Chu; D McAlister; P A Antonoplos
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Reprocessing of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Assessment of enzymatic cleaning agents and disinfectants against bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Mona Augustin; Terhi Ali-Vehmas; Faik Atroshi
Journal:  J Pharm Pharm Sci       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 2.327

9.  Cleaning and disinfection of equipment for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Report of a Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology Endoscopy Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 10.  Transmission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy.

Authors:  D H Spach; F E Silverstein; W E Stamm
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  2 in total

1.  Residual bioburden in reprocessed side-view endoscopes used for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Authors:  D L N L Ubhayawardana; J Kottahachchi; M M Weerasekera; I W M P Wanigasooriya; S S N Fernando; M De Silva
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2013-12

Review 2.  Infection Control Programs and Antibiotic Control Programs to Limit Transmission of Multi-Drug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections: Evolution of Old Problems and New Challenges for Institutes.

Authors:  Chang-Hua Chen; Li-Chen Lin; Yu-Jun Chang; Yu-Min Chen; Chin-Yen Chang; Chieh-Chen Huang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.