Literature DB >> 9717119

Comparison of cryopreservation outcome following intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional in vitro fertilization.

A Simon1, H Holzer, A Hurwitz, A Revel, B S Zentner, F Lossos, N Laufer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to compare the success rate of transferring frozen-thawed embryos generated from either intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) or conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF).
METHODS: A retrospective review of all frozen-thawed embryo transfer (ET) cycles between January 1995 and April 1997 was performed. There were 83 and 204 transfer cycles of frozen-thawed multicellular embryos generated from conventional IVF (group A) and ICSI (group B), respectively. The survival rate of frozen-thawed embryos and the outcome following ET in both groups were assessed.
RESULTS: The groups did not differ in age (31.7 +/- 4.6 and 30.6 +/- 6.0; mean +/- SD) or number of embryos transferred (3.5 +/- 1.1 and 3.8 +/- 1.3 for groups A and B, respectively). An acceptable pregnancy rate per ET was achieved in both groups, but the rate was significantly higher (P = 0.04) for group A than group B, 32.5 and 20%, respectively. Group A included frozen embryos of a higher quality than those of group B, but the proportion of embryos surviving after thawing was significantly higher for group B than group A (92.5 and 85.6%, respectively; P = 0.0004). The abortion rate did not differ between the two groups: 22 and 26.8% for groups A and B, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Although an overall high pregnancy rate was achieved following frozen-thawed ET, it was lower for cycles in which embryos had been generated from ICSI. This difference may be attributed to a lower prefreezing embryo quality in the ICSI group. Embryos originating from ICSI were not vulnerable to cryopreservation and, when implanted, resulted in a comparable abortion rate to thawed embryos of conventional IVF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9717119      PMCID: PMC3454802          DOI: 10.1007/bf02744937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  17 in total

1.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel treatment for all forms of male factor infertility.

Authors:  G D Palermo; J Cohen; M Alikani; A Adler; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Higher success rate by intracytoplasmic sperm injection than by subzonal insemination. Report of a second series of 300 consecutive treatment cycles.

Authors:  A C Van Steirteghem; J Liu; H Joris; Z Nagy; C Janssenswillen; H Tournaye; M P Derde; E Van Assche; P Devroey
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 3.  Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in novel reproductive technologies: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  D Navot; P A Bergh; N Laufer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Cryopreservation.

Authors:  A O Trounson
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.291

5.  Clinical outcome of cryopreserved human pronuclear stage embryos resulting from intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  L Hoover; A Baker; J H Check; D Lurie; D Summers
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo.

Authors:  A Trounson; L Mohr
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983 Oct 20-26       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Cryopreservation of supernumerary multicellular human embryos obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  A C Van Steirteghem; J Van der Elst; E Van den Abbeel; H Joris; M Camus; P Devroey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Human embryo viability after freezing with dimethylsulfoxide as a cryoprotectant.

Authors:  M Camus; E Van den Abbeel; L Van Waesberghe; A Wisanto; P Devroey; A C Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  A comparison between a standard and reduced dose of D-Trp-6-luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone administered after pituitary suppression for in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  A Simon; A Benshushan; A Shushan; G Zajicek; D Dorembus; A Lewin; N Laufer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Successful implantation of frozen sibling embryos is influenced by the outcome of the cycle from which they were derived.

Authors:  Y P Lin; D L Cassidenti; R R Chacon; S S Soubra; G F Rosen; B Yee
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of pregnancy outcome of pronuclear- and multicellular-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers.

Authors:  S Kattera; P Shrivastav; I Craft
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Clinical experiences of ICSI-ET thawing cycles with embryos cryopreserved at different developmental stages.

Authors:  Janos Konc; Katalin Kanyó; Sandor Cseh
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Analyzing factors affecting the success rate of frozen-thawed embryos.

Authors:  S Lahav-Baratz; M Koifman; H Shiloh; D Ishai; Z Wiener-Megnazi; M Dirnfeld
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Evaluation of clinical factors influencing pregnancy rate in frozen embryo transfer.

Authors:  Maryam Eftekhar; Elham Rahmani; Soheila Pourmasumi
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2014-07

5.  Predicting IVF outcome in poor ovarian responders.

Authors:  Raoul Orvieto; Ravit Nahum; Oshrit Lebovitz; Jigal Haas; Nitzan Mor; Eran Zilberberg; Adva Aizer; Michal Kirshenbaum
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.