Literature DB >> 2920845

Human embryo viability after freezing with dimethylsulfoxide as a cryoprotectant.

M Camus1, E Van den Abbeel, L Van Waesberghe, A Wisanto, P Devroey, A C Van Steirteghem.   

Abstract

This study concerns the effects of a slow freezing and thawing protocol using dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) as a cryoprotectant on the survival and viability of 319 supernumerary human embryos produced after in vitro fertilization. One hundred twenty-one transfers were performed in a natural cycle and 18 pregnancies were achieved (15%), from which 14 were ongoing (12%). Overall, 52% of the thawed embryos retained at least 50% of their initial blastomeres intact after thawing, and were replaced. Survival was strongly correlated to prefreezing embryonic quality, as 78% of type I embryos, 55% of type II, 40% of type III, and none of type IV could be transferred. Implantations were obtained from type I embryos (21% per embryo replaced) and from type II (14.5%), whereas none of the type III embryos resulted in a pregnancy. In the authors' experience, using the DMSO protocol, the best pregnancy rates were achieved when replacing 8-cell embryos of high morphologic prefreezing quality. No statistically significant difference could be demonstrated, however, in implantation rates between 8-cell and 4-cell embryos, or between synchronously and asynchronously dividing concepti.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2920845     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60554-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of cryopreservation outcome following intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  A Simon; H Holzer; A Hurwitz; A Revel; B S Zentner; F Lossos; N Laufer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Comparison of the cryopreservation of human embryos obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with a slow cooling or an ultrarapid cooling procedure.

Authors:  A L Mauri; C G Petersen; R L Baruffi; R C Ferreira; J G Franco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Freezing of embryos: early vs late stages.

Authors:  A C Van Steirteghem; E Van den Abbeel
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Freezing of embryos: early vs late stages.

Authors:  A Trounson; G Jones
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  A new, simple, automatic vitrification device: preliminary results with murine and bovine oocytes and embryos.

Authors:  Amir Arav; Yehudit Natan; Dorit Kalo; Alisa Komsky-Elbaz; Zvika Roth; Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti; Milton Leong; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Analyzing factors affecting the success rate of frozen-thawed embryos.

Authors:  S Lahav-Baratz; M Koifman; H Shiloh; D Ishai; Z Wiener-Megnazi; M Dirnfeld
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Birth following replacement of frozen-thawed embryos in an in vitro fertilization programme.

Authors:  S E Lewis; A I Traub; S Y Robinson; W Thompson
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1993-04

8.  Human embryonic genome activation initiates at the one-cell stage.

Authors:  Maki Asami; Brian Y H Lam; Marcella K Ma; Kara Rainbow; Stefanie Braun; Matthew D VerMilyea; Giles S H Yeo; Anthony C F Perry
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 24.633

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.